CSP solder ball reliability

M. Ikemizu, Y. Fukuzawa, J. Nakano, T. Yokoi, K. Miyajima, H. Funakura, E. Hosomi
{"title":"CSP solder ball reliability","authors":"M. Ikemizu, Y. Fukuzawa, J. Nakano, T. Yokoi, K. Miyajima, H. Funakura, E. Hosomi","doi":"10.1109/IEMT.1997.626961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The solder joint reliability for Chip Scale Package (CSP) as assembled on Printed Circuit Board (PCB) is believed to be poorer than that for QFP. The main cause of this poor reliability is the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) mismatch between CSP and PCB. With a view to implement CSP into practical board assembly without underfill, we performed experimental study and FEM analysis of solder joint reliability for three different CSPs, among which two were ceramic fine-pitched ball grid arrays (C-FBGAs) and one plastic package (P-FBGA). We found that solder ball life predictions from the FEM analysis coupled with Coffin-Manson's equation were in good agreement with results from reliability experiments for C-FBGA (high-a) and P-FBGA, whereas difference between them was observed in the case of C-FBGA (Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/). Among three CSPs, P-FBGA turned out to have excellent solder fatigue life and there is the prospect it can be implemented in board assembly without underfill.","PeriodicalId":227971,"journal":{"name":"Twenty First IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium Proceedings 1997 IEMT Symposium","volume":"1056 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twenty First IEEE/CPMT International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium Proceedings 1997 IEMT Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMT.1997.626961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The solder joint reliability for Chip Scale Package (CSP) as assembled on Printed Circuit Board (PCB) is believed to be poorer than that for QFP. The main cause of this poor reliability is the Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) mismatch between CSP and PCB. With a view to implement CSP into practical board assembly without underfill, we performed experimental study and FEM analysis of solder joint reliability for three different CSPs, among which two were ceramic fine-pitched ball grid arrays (C-FBGAs) and one plastic package (P-FBGA). We found that solder ball life predictions from the FEM analysis coupled with Coffin-Manson's equation were in good agreement with results from reliability experiments for C-FBGA (high-a) and P-FBGA, whereas difference between them was observed in the case of C-FBGA (Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/). Among three CSPs, P-FBGA turned out to have excellent solder fatigue life and there is the prospect it can be implemented in board assembly without underfill.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CSP焊球可靠性
芯片级封装(CSP)在印刷电路板(PCB)上组装时的焊点可靠性被认为比QFP要差。这种可靠性差的主要原因是CSP和PCB之间的热膨胀系数(CTE)不匹配。为了将CSP应用于无底填充的实际电路板组装中,我们对三种不同CSP的焊点可靠性进行了实验研究和有限元分析,其中两种是陶瓷细斜球栅阵列(c - fbga)和一种塑料封装(P-FBGA)。我们发现,结合Coffin-Manson方程的有限元分析得出的焊料球寿命预测与C-FBGA(高a)和P-FBGA的可靠性实验结果吻合良好,而C-FBGA (Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/)的可靠性实验结果存在差异。在三种csp中,P-FBGA具有优异的焊料疲劳寿命,有望在无欠填充的电路板组装中实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond refractive optical lithography next generation lithography "What's after 193 nm?" A new test technology for package, module and PCB interconnects Energy model for end-of-life computer disposition Moisture absorption and autoclave performance optimization of glob top ball grid array Recipe generation for large-area meniscus coating using Kalman filter estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1