Simulator Fidelity Influences the Sense of Presence in Driving Simulators

Chantal Himmels, Teresa Rock, J. Venrooij, A. Riener
{"title":"Simulator Fidelity Influences the Sense of Presence in Driving Simulators","authors":"Chantal Himmels, Teresa Rock, J. Venrooij, A. Riener","doi":"10.1145/3544999.3552526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driving simulator studies often face the problem that traffic situations cannot be represented sufficiently realistically, which reduces the sense of presence and can influence the driving behavior of the participants. However, factors influencing the sense of presence in driving simulators have yet poorly been investigated. We conducted a within-subjects experiment with N=50 participants comparing presence between a lower- and a higher-fidelity simulator in different driving scenarios. Results indicate that a higher sense of presence can be achieved using a higher-fidelity simulator. Due to differences in both the visualization and the motion systems of the two simulators, the differences cannot yet be attributed to individual factors on the simulator side. The exact relation of presence and driving behavior likewise remains unclear and should be the subject of further investigation.","PeriodicalId":350782,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3544999.3552526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Driving simulator studies often face the problem that traffic situations cannot be represented sufficiently realistically, which reduces the sense of presence and can influence the driving behavior of the participants. However, factors influencing the sense of presence in driving simulators have yet poorly been investigated. We conducted a within-subjects experiment with N=50 participants comparing presence between a lower- and a higher-fidelity simulator in different driving scenarios. Results indicate that a higher sense of presence can be achieved using a higher-fidelity simulator. Due to differences in both the visualization and the motion systems of the two simulators, the differences cannot yet be attributed to individual factors on the simulator side. The exact relation of presence and driving behavior likewise remains unclear and should be the subject of further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟器保真度影响驾驶模拟器的存在感
驾驶模拟器研究经常面临交通状况不能充分真实再现的问题,降低了参与者的存在感,影响了参与者的驾驶行为。然而,影响驾驶模拟器中存在感的因素尚未得到充分的研究。我们进行了一项有N=50名参与者的受试者内实验,比较了在不同驾驶场景下低保真度模拟器和高保真度模拟器的存在。结果表明,使用高保真度的模拟器可以获得更高的存在感。由于两种模拟器在可视化和运动系统上的差异,这些差异还不能归因于模拟器方面的个别因素。在场和驾驶行为的确切关系同样也不清楚,应该是进一步调查的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toward a High-Level Integrative Comfort Model in Autonomous Driving Design for Perception - A Systematic Approach for the Design of Driving Automation Systems based on the Users’ Perception Using Task Switching to Explain Effects of Non-Driving Related Activities on Takeover and Manual Driving Behavior Following Level 3 Automated Driving Increasing Driving Safety and In-Vehicle Gesture-Based Menu Navigation Accuracy with a Heads-up Display Simulator-Based Study of the Response Time and Defensive Behavior of Drivers in Unexpected Dangers at an Intersection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1