Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Sosiosaintifik Siswa SMP

D. Rahman
{"title":"Analisis Argumentasi dalam Isu Sosiosaintifik Siswa SMP","authors":"D. Rahman","doi":"10.21043/THABIEA.V1I1.3868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of Argumentation in Socio-Scientific Issues of junior High School Students. The 21st Century Education focuses on the development of the competence in creativity, critical-thinking, communication, and collaboration. Based on that reason, the argumentation can be one of the solutions to answer this issue since it facilitates the critical-thinking and communication competences. Arguments can be used in socio-scientific issues that present open problems and debatable. The aims of research is to find out the quality of the argumentation on the socio-scientific issue through the plastic theme of the topic of pollution. Argumentation analysis using TAP (Toulmin's Argument Pattern) consisting of 6 components, namely claims, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttals. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the quality of the argumentation in the socio-scientific issues of junior high school students was still low. The low quality of argumentation is caused by the poor of students' concept understanding.","PeriodicalId":308683,"journal":{"name":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/THABIEA.V1I1.3868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Analysis of Argumentation in Socio-Scientific Issues of junior High School Students. The 21st Century Education focuses on the development of the competence in creativity, critical-thinking, communication, and collaboration. Based on that reason, the argumentation can be one of the solutions to answer this issue since it facilitates the critical-thinking and communication competences. Arguments can be used in socio-scientific issues that present open problems and debatable. The aims of research is to find out the quality of the argumentation on the socio-scientific issue through the plastic theme of the topic of pollution. Argumentation analysis using TAP (Toulmin's Argument Pattern) consisting of 6 components, namely claims, data, warrant, backing, qualifier, and rebuttals. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the quality of the argumentation in the socio-scientific issues of junior high school students was still low. The low quality of argumentation is caused by the poor of students' concept understanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初中生社会科学问题中的论证分析。21世纪的教育注重创造力、批判性思维、沟通和协作能力的发展。基于这个原因,论证可以成为回答这个问题的解决方案之一,因为它有助于批判性思维和沟通能力。论证可以用于社会科学问题,提出开放的问题和有争议的。研究的目的是通过污染这一主题的可塑性来发现关于社会科学问题的论证质量。使用TAP (Toulmin’s Argument Pattern)进行论证分析,由6个组成部分组成,即主张、数据、保证、支持、限定词和反驳。根据研究结果发现,初中生社会科学问题的论证质量仍然较低。论证质量的低下是由于学生对概念理解的不充分造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of augmented reality learning media to improve higher-order thinking skills in kinematics material Construct validity analysis with messick validity approach and rasch model application on scientific reasoning test items Technology-enabled active learning simulations (TEALSim) on distance learning of physics Science teachers and students’ perspectives on SSI-based instruction: basis on the development of SSI-based curricular resources Enhancing students’ science process skill and self-regulation through inquiry interactive demonstration in science materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1