Science teachers and students’ perspectives on SSI-based instruction: basis on the development of SSI-based curricular resources

Anwar Ismael Kolong, Monera A. Salic-Hairulla, Amelia T. Buan, S. Pitiporntapin
{"title":"Science teachers and students’ perspectives on SSI-based instruction: basis on the development of SSI-based curricular resources","authors":"Anwar Ismael Kolong, Monera A. Salic-Hairulla, Amelia T. Buan, S. Pitiporntapin","doi":"10.21043/thabiea.v6i1.18215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the most studies empirically reveal the advantages of teaching Socioscientific Issues (SSIs)  in catering the evolution of scientific knowledge and pedagogy in teaching science concepts better to meet the required competencies and students’ needs to develop appropriate skills and capabilities, the teaching of SSI-based is still obscure and new to the country due to science teachers find it difficult and unable to integrate in their classroom due  to lack of curricular resources, unfamiliarity, infrequent integration, and teaching trust issues which results to learning gap among students; inability to argument and less motivated to learning SSIs. A semi-detailed questionnaire was used to collect information such as teacher-student background knowledge on SSIs and SSI-based pedagogy,perception on the pedagogy and the need to develop SSI-based curricular resources. Interviews were done to selected teachers and students to highlight relevant and significant opinions. Furthermore, results revealed that science teachers and students are not acquainted with SSIs. Most teachers don’t know SSIs and don’t employ SSI-based lessons in their teaching resulting to zero experience among students to SSIs. Nevertheless, both teachers and student respondents asserted that the development of SSI-based curricular resources may  improve teaching and learning processes in science areas which may positively affect to students deeper understanding, science practices and argumentation.","PeriodicalId":308683,"journal":{"name":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v6i1.18215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the most studies empirically reveal the advantages of teaching Socioscientific Issues (SSIs)  in catering the evolution of scientific knowledge and pedagogy in teaching science concepts better to meet the required competencies and students’ needs to develop appropriate skills and capabilities, the teaching of SSI-based is still obscure and new to the country due to science teachers find it difficult and unable to integrate in their classroom due  to lack of curricular resources, unfamiliarity, infrequent integration, and teaching trust issues which results to learning gap among students; inability to argument and less motivated to learning SSIs. A semi-detailed questionnaire was used to collect information such as teacher-student background knowledge on SSIs and SSI-based pedagogy,perception on the pedagogy and the need to develop SSI-based curricular resources. Interviews were done to selected teachers and students to highlight relevant and significant opinions. Furthermore, results revealed that science teachers and students are not acquainted with SSIs. Most teachers don’t know SSIs and don’t employ SSI-based lessons in their teaching resulting to zero experience among students to SSIs. Nevertheless, both teachers and student respondents asserted that the development of SSI-based curricular resources may  improve teaching and learning processes in science areas which may positively affect to students deeper understanding, science practices and argumentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学教师和学生对基于ssid教学的看法——基于ssid课程资源的开发
尽管大多数实证研究都揭示了教学社会科学问题(ssi)在迎合科学知识的演变和教学科学概念的教学法方面的优势,以更好地满足所需的能力和学生发展适当技能和能力的需要,但由于缺乏课程资源,科学教师发现难以融入课堂,因此基于社会科学问题(ssi)的教学对国家来说仍然是模糊不清的。学生之间的不熟悉、不频繁的整合和教学信任问题导致学生之间的学习差距;不能与人争论,学习ssi的动力不足。采用半详细的问卷调查,收集师生对ssi和基于ssi教学法的背景知识、对教学法的看法以及开发基于ssi课程资源的需求等信息。对选定的教师和学生进行访谈,以突出相关和重要的意见。此外,研究结果还显示,科学教师和学生不熟悉ssi。大多数教师不了解ssi,也没有在教学中使用基于ssi的课程,导致学生对ssi的经验为零。然而,教师和学生都认为,基于科学科学的课程资源的开发可以改善科学领域的教与学过程,这可能对学生更深层次的理解、科学实践和论证产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of augmented reality learning media to improve higher-order thinking skills in kinematics material Construct validity analysis with messick validity approach and rasch model application on scientific reasoning test items Technology-enabled active learning simulations (TEALSim) on distance learning of physics Science teachers and students’ perspectives on SSI-based instruction: basis on the development of SSI-based curricular resources Enhancing students’ science process skill and self-regulation through inquiry interactive demonstration in science materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1