A unified approach to automate the usage of plagiarism detection tools in programming courses

Portillo Dominguez, Andres Omar, Vanessa Ayala-Rivera, Evin Murphy, John Murphy, A. O. Portillo-Dominguez
{"title":"A unified approach to automate the usage of plagiarism detection tools in programming courses","authors":"Portillo Dominguez, Andres Omar, Vanessa Ayala-Rivera, Evin Murphy, John Murphy, A. O. Portillo-Dominguez","doi":"10.1109/ICCSE.2017.8085456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plagiarism in programming assignments is an extremely common problem in universities. While there are many tools that automate the detection of plagiarism in source code, users still need to inspect the results and decide whether there is plagiarism or not. Moreover, users often rely on a single tool (using it as “gold standard” for all cases), which can be ineffective and risky. Hence, it is desirable to make use of several tools to complement their results. However, various limitations exist in these tools that make their usage a very time-consuming task, such as the need of manually analyzing and correlating their multiple outputs. In this paper, we propose an automated system that addresses the common usage limitations of plagiarism detection tools. The system automatically manages the execution of different plagiarism tools and generates a consolidated comparative visualization of their results. Consequently, the user can make better-informed decisions about potential plagiarisms. Our experimental results show that the effort and expertise required to use plagiarism detection tools is significantly reduced, while the probability of detecting plagiarism is increased. Results also show that our system is lightweight (in terms of computational resources), proving it is practical for real-world usage.","PeriodicalId":256055,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2017.8085456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Plagiarism in programming assignments is an extremely common problem in universities. While there are many tools that automate the detection of plagiarism in source code, users still need to inspect the results and decide whether there is plagiarism or not. Moreover, users often rely on a single tool (using it as “gold standard” for all cases), which can be ineffective and risky. Hence, it is desirable to make use of several tools to complement their results. However, various limitations exist in these tools that make their usage a very time-consuming task, such as the need of manually analyzing and correlating their multiple outputs. In this paper, we propose an automated system that addresses the common usage limitations of plagiarism detection tools. The system automatically manages the execution of different plagiarism tools and generates a consolidated comparative visualization of their results. Consequently, the user can make better-informed decisions about potential plagiarisms. Our experimental results show that the effort and expertise required to use plagiarism detection tools is significantly reduced, while the probability of detecting plagiarism is increased. Results also show that our system is lightweight (in terms of computational resources), proving it is practical for real-world usage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种在编程课程中自动使用抄袭检测工具的统一方法
在大学里,编程作业中的抄袭是一个非常普遍的问题。虽然有许多工具可以自动检测源代码中的抄袭,但用户仍然需要检查结果并决定是否存在抄袭。此外,用户通常依赖于单一工具(将其作为所有情况下的“黄金标准”),这可能是无效的和有风险的。因此,需要使用几种工具来补充它们的结果。然而,这些工具中存在各种限制,使得使用它们成为一项非常耗时的任务,例如需要手动分析和关联它们的多个输出。在本文中,我们提出了一个自动化系统,解决了抄袭检测工具的常见使用限制。该系统自动管理不同剽窃工具的执行,并对其结果生成统一的比较可视化。因此,用户可以对潜在的抄袭做出更明智的决定。我们的实验结果表明,使用抄袭检测工具所需的努力和专业知识显着减少,而检测到抄袭的概率增加。结果还表明,我们的系统是轻量级的(就计算资源而言),证明了它在实际使用中是实用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A unified approach to automate the usage of plagiarism detection tools in programming courses Software verification of Orion cockpit displays Wine quality identification based on data mining research A comparison of inertial-based navigation algorithms for a low-cost indoor mobile robot A HCI design for developing touch-operation-based DGS: What you think is what you get
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1