{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Instrument of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education","authors":"Ayla Bayık Temel, Aynur Uysal Toraman, Gulengul Mermer, Ebru Konal, Esin Ateş","doi":"10.5961/higheredusci.1078501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Doctoral Education in Nursing \n(QNDE) scale. The lack of a measurement tool examining the quality of doctoral education in nursing in a national context is the reason for \nthis study. Data were collected from 55 teaching staff and 225 doctorate students. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used \nfor test validity. Cronbach’s α coefficient of reliability, independent-sample t test, and test-retest analysis were calculated to test Reliability. \nThe factor loads ranged between 0.51-0.91.The construct validity was good (χ2/df =3.02; RMSEA = 0.085; CFI = 0.87; NFI = 0.90; GFI \n= 0.79; TLI = 0.90; IFI =0.91; p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was 0.94. The results of this study show that the Turkish \nversion of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education instrument is a valid and reliable tool.","PeriodicalId":119364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1078501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Quality of Doctoral Education in Nursing
(QNDE) scale. The lack of a measurement tool examining the quality of doctoral education in nursing in a national context is the reason for
this study. Data were collected from 55 teaching staff and 225 doctorate students. Explanatory and confirmatory factor analyzes were used
for test validity. Cronbach’s α coefficient of reliability, independent-sample t test, and test-retest analysis were calculated to test Reliability.
The factor loads ranged between 0.51-0.91.The construct validity was good (χ2/df =3.02; RMSEA = 0.085; CFI = 0.87; NFI = 0.90; GFI
= 0.79; TLI = 0.90; IFI =0.91; p < 0.001). The Cronbach alpha value of the scale was 0.94. The results of this study show that the Turkish
version of the Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education instrument is a valid and reliable tool.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
