Critical Thinking Ability and Students’ Learning Achievement of Sociology Education in the Industrial Sociology Courses

Abdullah Muzakar, Nurdin Ibrahim, P. Priyono
{"title":"Critical Thinking Ability and Students’ Learning Achievement of Sociology Education in the Industrial Sociology Courses","authors":"Abdullah Muzakar, Nurdin Ibrahim, P. Priyono","doi":"10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to showed that the students’ learning achievements of Sociology Education were influenced by the critical thinking ability of students themselves; both were taught using Group Investigation (GI) and Direct Instruction Learning strategies. The participants of this study were Sociology Education students at one of the private universities in Indonesia. This research design used a treatment by level 2 x 2 design. In this design, the independent variable consisted of Group Investigation Learning strategy and Direct Instruction Learning strategy (A). The independent variable attribute was classified into 2, namely high critical thinking and low critical thinking (B). The research hypothesis was tested using analysis of variance (ANAVA) of two-way 2 x 2 and continued with the Dunnet t test. The results showed that the students’ learning achievement who had high critical thinking ability was better taught using Group Investigation (GI) learning strategy compared with Direct Instruction (DI) learning strategy. Therefore, the students’ learning achievement who had low critical thinking ability was better taught using Direct Instruction (DI) Learning strategy than taught using Group Investigation (GI) learning strategy. Keywords—critical thinking; learning achievement; sociology education","PeriodicalId":220496,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICETEP-18.2019.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to showed that the students’ learning achievements of Sociology Education were influenced by the critical thinking ability of students themselves; both were taught using Group Investigation (GI) and Direct Instruction Learning strategies. The participants of this study were Sociology Education students at one of the private universities in Indonesia. This research design used a treatment by level 2 x 2 design. In this design, the independent variable consisted of Group Investigation Learning strategy and Direct Instruction Learning strategy (A). The independent variable attribute was classified into 2, namely high critical thinking and low critical thinking (B). The research hypothesis was tested using analysis of variance (ANAVA) of two-way 2 x 2 and continued with the Dunnet t test. The results showed that the students’ learning achievement who had high critical thinking ability was better taught using Group Investigation (GI) learning strategy compared with Direct Instruction (DI) learning strategy. Therefore, the students’ learning achievement who had low critical thinking ability was better taught using Direct Instruction (DI) Learning strategy than taught using Group Investigation (GI) learning strategy. Keywords—critical thinking; learning achievement; sociology education
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业社会学课程中批判性思维能力与学生社会学教育学习成果
本研究旨在说明学生的批判性思维能力对社会学教育的学习成绩有影响;采用小组调查(GI)和直接指导学习策略进行教学。本研究的参与者为印尼一所私立大学社会学教育专业的学生。本研究设计采用2 × 2水平处理设计。在本设计中,自变量包括小组调查学习策略和直接指导学习策略(A)。自变量属性分为2类,即高批判性思维和低批判性思维(B)。使用双向2 × 2的方差分析(ANAVA)对研究假设进行检验,并继续进行Dunnet t检验。结果表明,采用小组调查学习策略对具有较高批判性思维能力的学生的学习成绩优于直接指导学习策略。因此,对于批判性思维能力较低的学生,采用直接指导(DI)学习策略的教学效果优于采用小组调查(GI)学习策略的教学效果。Keywords-critical思维;学习成绩;教育社会学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnomathematics and Outdoor Learning to Improve Problem Solving Ability Abstract Thesis Analysis in Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching Fields Character Education through People's Story Increasing Self-efficacy through Inclusive Education for Autistic Children The Relationship between Motivation, Engagement and Performance of Employee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1