Peter Winch on the Tractatus and the unity of Wittgenstein’s philosophy

Cora Diamond
{"title":"Peter Winch on the Tractatus and the unity of Wittgenstein’s philosophy","authors":"Cora Diamond","doi":"10.1515/9783110328912.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peter Winch rejected the widespread view that Wittgenstein put forwardtwo entirely different philosophies in his early and later work. He took the“two-Wittgenstein” view to be associated with serious misunderstandings ofboth the Tractatus and Wittgenstein’s later thought. In this paper, Winch’sreading of the Tractatus and his criticisms of Norman Malcolm’s interpretationare examined. The paper tries to show that Winch was right in rejecting“mentalist” readings of the Tractatus, but that there are also problemswith Winch’s own reading.","PeriodicalId":317292,"journal":{"name":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110328912.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Peter Winch rejected the widespread view that Wittgenstein put forwardtwo entirely different philosophies in his early and later work. He took the“two-Wittgenstein” view to be associated with serious misunderstandings ofboth the Tractatus and Wittgenstein’s later thought. In this paper, Winch’sreading of the Tractatus and his criticisms of Norman Malcolm’s interpretationare examined. The paper tries to show that Winch was right in rejecting“mentalist” readings of the Tractatus, but that there are also problemswith Winch’s own reading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
彼得·温奇论《哲学论》与维特根斯坦哲学的统一性
人们普遍认为维特根斯坦在他的早期和后期作品中提出了两种完全不同的哲学,但彼得·温奇对此持否定态度。他把“两个维特根斯坦”的观点与对《论》和维特根斯坦后来思想的严重误解联系在一起。本文考察了温奇对《论》的解读及其对诺曼·马尔科姆诠释的批判。这篇论文试图表明,温奇拒绝对《论》的“唯心主义”解读是正确的,但温奇自己的解读也存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'The Mind's Eye': Visualizing the Non-visual and the 'Epistemology of the Line' Substantial Motion and Perpetual Creation Anlass, Begriff und Aufgabe interkultureller Philosophie Intercultural Polylogues in Philosophy Substances, Attributes, and Modes – Substantial Structures in Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1