'The Mind's Eye': Visualizing the Non-visual and the 'Epistemology of the Line'

Sybille Krämer
{"title":"'The Mind's Eye': Visualizing the Non-visual and the 'Epistemology of the Line'","authors":"Sybille Krämer","doi":"10.1515/9783110330496.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between ‘reality’ and the ‘imaginary’ there is the intermediary world of graphical artifacts like writing, notations, diagrams, graphs and maps. What are the epistemological functions of these diagrammatical inscriptions, situated between language and the pictorial? The guiding hypothesis here is that the ‘diagrammatical’ provides a link between the perceptible and the rational, insofar as it not only bridges the gap between these two realms but also gives rise to the very possibility of differentiating between the ‘aisthetic’ and the ‘noethic’. Starting from a reflection on exemplary forms of diagrammatical reasoning in philosophy (Platon, Descartes, Wittgenstein) first steps in the direction of an ‘ epistemology of the line’ will be sketched: (i) Surface, lines, and points are the building elements of diagrammatic graphism. (ii) The diagrammatic space is not an ‘illustrative’ but an operative space within which eye, hand and mind work together: thus the ‘mind’s eye’ is born. (iii) Diagrammatical spatiality has a dual character: it is both a perceptible concrete surface and a rational abstract space. This duality is the dodge of the diagrammatical. (iv) In this dual character it functions as a means for visualizing the non visual and for ‘spatializing’ the non-spatial. Thus bringing theoretical entities to intuition. Placing the theme within a cultural perspective: Could the invention of inscribed surface perhaps have meant for the mobility and productivity of the mind what the invention of the wheel meant for the mobility and productivity of the human body?","PeriodicalId":317292,"journal":{"name":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110330496.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Between ‘reality’ and the ‘imaginary’ there is the intermediary world of graphical artifacts like writing, notations, diagrams, graphs and maps. What are the epistemological functions of these diagrammatical inscriptions, situated between language and the pictorial? The guiding hypothesis here is that the ‘diagrammatical’ provides a link between the perceptible and the rational, insofar as it not only bridges the gap between these two realms but also gives rise to the very possibility of differentiating between the ‘aisthetic’ and the ‘noethic’. Starting from a reflection on exemplary forms of diagrammatical reasoning in philosophy (Platon, Descartes, Wittgenstein) first steps in the direction of an ‘ epistemology of the line’ will be sketched: (i) Surface, lines, and points are the building elements of diagrammatic graphism. (ii) The diagrammatic space is not an ‘illustrative’ but an operative space within which eye, hand and mind work together: thus the ‘mind’s eye’ is born. (iii) Diagrammatical spatiality has a dual character: it is both a perceptible concrete surface and a rational abstract space. This duality is the dodge of the diagrammatical. (iv) In this dual character it functions as a means for visualizing the non visual and for ‘spatializing’ the non-spatial. Thus bringing theoretical entities to intuition. Placing the theme within a cultural perspective: Could the invention of inscribed surface perhaps have meant for the mobility and productivity of the mind what the invention of the wheel meant for the mobility and productivity of the human body?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“心灵之眼”:视觉化非视觉与“线的认识论”
在“现实”和“想象”之间,有一个图形人工制品的中介世界,比如文字、符号、图表、图形和地图。这些位于语言和图画之间的图解铭文的认识论功能是什么?这里的指导假设是,“图解”提供了可感知和理性之间的联系,因为它不仅在这两个领域之间架起了桥梁,而且还产生了区分“审美”和“非伦理”的可能性。从对哲学中图解推理的典型形式(柏拉图、笛卡尔、维特根斯坦)的反思开始,我们将概述向“线的认识论”方向迈出的第一步:(1)面、线和点是图解主义的构成要素。(ii)图解空间不是一个“说明性的”空间,而是一个操作空间,在这个空间里,眼睛、手和心灵一起工作:因此,“心灵之眼”诞生了。(三)图解空间性具有双重特征:既是可感知的具体表面,又是理性的抽象空间。这种二元性是图解的闪避。(iv)在这种双重特征中,它作为一种手段,将非视觉的东西可视化,并将非空间的东西“空间化”。从而将理论实体带入直觉。将主题置于文化视角中:雕刻表面的发明是否意味着思维的移动性和生产力,就像轮子的发明意味着人体的移动性和生产力一样?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'The Mind's Eye': Visualizing the Non-visual and the 'Epistemology of the Line' Substantial Motion and Perpetual Creation Anlass, Begriff und Aufgabe interkultureller Philosophie Intercultural Polylogues in Philosophy Substances, Attributes, and Modes – Substantial Structures in Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1