Development of a Prototype Questionnaire to Survey Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering: Principles and Methodologies in the First Prototype

K. S. Louis, B. Lubker, J. Yaruss, T. A. Adkins, J. Pill
{"title":"Development of a Prototype Questionnaire to Survey Public Attitudes Toward Stuttering: Principles and Methodologies in the First Prototype","authors":"K. S. Louis, B. Lubker, J. Yaruss, T. A. Adkins, J. Pill","doi":"10.5580/11b7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Experimental Edition of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes (POSHA-E) was designed to investigate public opinions about stuttering and stuttering compared to other attributes cross-culturally and internationally. Respondents (n = 165) rated items on stuttering in the context of eight other attributes, or “anchors,” assumed to range from negative (e.g., “mental illness”), to neutral (e.g., “lefthanded”), to positive (e.g., “intelligent”). Only those methodological results that inform subsequent development of this prototype survey instrument or the data collection processes are elaborated. The field test evaluated the efficiency of a quasi-continuous scale, order effects, scoring efficiency, and data reduction in nonprobability samples. Order effects were minimal. Problems in respondent scoring and data reduction were appreciable, but these did not appear to affect the mean scores on the POSHA-E. Results have implications for data collection methods for the population-based international project and illustrate complexities of contemporary survey research methods. This research project was carried out at the Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology at West Virginia University using resources of the Department. PROJECT OVERVIEW, RATIONALE, AND MEASUREMENT ISSUES","PeriodicalId":247354,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/11b7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

The Experimental Edition of the Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes (POSHA-E) was designed to investigate public opinions about stuttering and stuttering compared to other attributes cross-culturally and internationally. Respondents (n = 165) rated items on stuttering in the context of eight other attributes, or “anchors,” assumed to range from negative (e.g., “mental illness”), to neutral (e.g., “lefthanded”), to positive (e.g., “intelligent”). Only those methodological results that inform subsequent development of this prototype survey instrument or the data collection processes are elaborated. The field test evaluated the efficiency of a quasi-continuous scale, order effects, scoring efficiency, and data reduction in nonprobability samples. Order effects were minimal. Problems in respondent scoring and data reduction were appreciable, but these did not appear to affect the mean scores on the POSHA-E. Results have implications for data collection methods for the population-based international project and illustrate complexities of contemporary survey research methods. This research project was carried out at the Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology at West Virginia University using resources of the Department. PROJECT OVERVIEW, RATIONALE, AND MEASUREMENT ISSUES
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查公众对口吃态度的原型问卷的开发:第一原型的原则和方法
《人类属性民意调查实验版》(POSHA-E)旨在跨文化、跨国际调查公众对口吃和口吃与其他属性的看法。受访者(n = 165)在其他八个属性或“锚”的背景下对口吃进行评分,假设范围从消极(例如,“精神疾病”)到中性(例如,“左撇子”)到积极(例如,“聪明”)。只有那些方法学上的结果,告知该原型调查仪器的后续发展或数据收集过程进行了阐述。现场测试评估了准连续尺度的效率、顺序效应、评分效率和非概率样本中的数据减少。秩序效应很小。被调查者得分和数据减少的问题是明显的,但这些似乎并不影响POSHA-E的平均得分。结果对以人口为基础的国际项目的数据收集方法有影响,并说明了当代调查研究方法的复杂性。本研究项目由西弗吉尼亚大学言语病理与听力学系利用该系的资源进行。项目概述、基本原理和度量问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Participation Rates In Epidemiology Studies And Surveys: A Review 2007–2015 Population Migration Through Railroads And Spatial Diffusion Of Polio In India: A Cross-Sectional Pr Adjusting Structural Equation Modelling Of Spiritual Coping Scale: Use Of The Sattora-Bentler Method As An Alternative To Maximum Likelihood Estimation An Approach to Comparing Nations for Inclusion of Studies in Health-based Systematic Literature Reviews Perspectives, Constructs And Methods In The Measurement Of Multimorbidity And Comorbidity: A Critical Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1