Controversias de la nueva ley educativa (LOMLOE): la concesión complementaria del título de la ESO en Formación Profesional Básica - [Controversies of the new educational law (LOMLOE): the complementary granting of the ESO degree in Basic Vocational Training]

José Luis Martín Soria, Paula Renés Arellano, Ana Rosa Martín Minguijón
{"title":"Controversias de la nueva ley educativa (LOMLOE): la concesión complementaria del título de la ESO en Formación Profesional Básica - [Controversies of the new educational law (LOMLOE): the complementary granting of the ESO degree in Basic Vocational Training]","authors":"José Luis Martín Soria, Paula Renés Arellano, Ana Rosa Martín Minguijón","doi":"10.26754/cinaic.2021.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- Since the arrival of democracy in our country with the 1978 Constitution, there have been numerous structural changes in educational policies, as many as different governments have had in Spain. These educational reforms were mainly aimed at achieving a quality education for all people, regardless of their personal, economic, or social characteristics. And the current LOMLOE is no exception. A relevant issue raised by this law, recently approved in Congress, is the granting of the ESO degree for students who complete FPB. This measure, aimed at addressing diversity by facilitating social inclusion, raises controversies among members of the educational community as it is considered inappropriate. Undoubtedly, it would pose an attraction for students on the verge of socio-educational exclusion, to enroll in FPB, especially students with special educational needs condemned to unsuccessfully abandon their education. This study aims to clarify the regulatory context on the implementation of this measure and encourages the debate on whether this positive discrimination is fair compared to other educational programs, or is it a comparative offense for others? And, if will this measure be truly useful and recommendable for its purpose, attending to diversity and facilitating social inclusion?","PeriodicalId":369305,"journal":{"name":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2021.0080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

- Since the arrival of democracy in our country with the 1978 Constitution, there have been numerous structural changes in educational policies, as many as different governments have had in Spain. These educational reforms were mainly aimed at achieving a quality education for all people, regardless of their personal, economic, or social characteristics. And the current LOMLOE is no exception. A relevant issue raised by this law, recently approved in Congress, is the granting of the ESO degree for students who complete FPB. This measure, aimed at addressing diversity by facilitating social inclusion, raises controversies among members of the educational community as it is considered inappropriate. Undoubtedly, it would pose an attraction for students on the verge of socio-educational exclusion, to enroll in FPB, especially students with special educational needs condemned to unsuccessfully abandon their education. This study aims to clarify the regulatory context on the implementation of this measure and encourages the debate on whether this positive discrimination is fair compared to other educational programs, or is it a comparative offense for others? And, if will this measure be truly useful and recommendable for its purpose, attending to diversity and facilitating social inclusion?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新教育法争议(LOMLOE):基础职业培训ESO文凭的补充授予-[新教育法争议(LOMLOE):基础职业培训ESO文凭的补充授予]
-自从我国通过1978年宪法实现民主以来,教育政策发生了许多结构性变化,与西班牙不同政府的变化一样多。这些教育改革的主要目的是为所有人实现优质教育,无论其个人、经济或社会特征如何。目前的LOMLOE也不例外。最近在国会通过的这项法律提出的一个相关问题是,为完成FPB的学生授予ESO学位。该措施旨在通过促进社会包容来解决多样性问题,但被认为是不合适的,因此在教育界引发了争议。毫无疑问,这将吸引那些处于社会教育排斥边缘的学生,特别是那些有特殊教育需要的学生,他们注定要放弃自己的教育。本研究旨在澄清实施这一措施的监管背景,并鼓励人们就这种积极的歧视与其他教育项目相比是否公平,或者对其他教育项目来说是一种相对的冒犯进行辩论。而且,这项措施是否真的有用和值得推荐,以达到其关注多样性和促进社会包容的目的?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The flipped classroom for Physics teaching Metodología para el desarrollo del pensamiento computacional en tiempos de COVID-19 - [Methodology for the development of Computational Thinking in times of COVID-19] Un modelo de aprendizaje servicio: sistema de ayuda al diseño y construcción de viviendas humildes con quincha como material estructural en Perú - [A service-learning model: an aid system for design and construction of low-cost quincha-made houses in Peru] Cuestionario para la selección de conceptos fundamentales: análisis de validez y confiabilidad - [Questionnaire for the selection of fundamental concepts: analysis of validity and reliability] El modelo semi-presencial y virtual a examen en el área de ingeniería - [Semi-presential and online scenarios under exam in engineering degrees]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1