Responses to SEC comment letters on cybersecurity disclosures: An exploratory study

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Accounting Information Systems Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100567
Tawei Wang , Ju-Chun Yen , Kyunghee Yoon
{"title":"Responses to SEC comment letters on cybersecurity disclosures: An exploratory study","authors":"Tawei Wang ,&nbsp;Ju-Chun Yen ,&nbsp;Kyunghee Yoon","doi":"10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cybersecurity comment letters issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may ask companies to disclose additional or clarifying information about their cybersecurity incidents, risks, and corresponding controls, where appropriate. Although responding to the comment letter in the form of disclosing more information about cybersecurity can better signal a company’s security posture to investors and comply with regulations, it may also expose a company to higher levels of cybersecurity risks because of disclosing proprietary cybersecurity information. Using a sample consisting of 52 cybersecurity comment letters issued between 2011 and 2019 and their no-letter-matched companies, our findings suggest that comment letter companies change their disclosures regarding cybersecurity, as required by the SEC. However, as shown in the short-term cumulative abnormal returns around response letter days, the stock market reacts negatively to the responses. Our results provide policy implications by showing that market participants may not react positively to transparency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100567"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089522000197","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cybersecurity comment letters issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may ask companies to disclose additional or clarifying information about their cybersecurity incidents, risks, and corresponding controls, where appropriate. Although responding to the comment letter in the form of disclosing more information about cybersecurity can better signal a company’s security posture to investors and comply with regulations, it may also expose a company to higher levels of cybersecurity risks because of disclosing proprietary cybersecurity information. Using a sample consisting of 52 cybersecurity comment letters issued between 2011 and 2019 and their no-letter-matched companies, our findings suggest that comment letter companies change their disclosures regarding cybersecurity, as required by the SEC. However, as shown in the short-term cumulative abnormal returns around response letter days, the stock market reacts negatively to the responses. Our results provide policy implications by showing that market participants may not react positively to transparency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对美国证券交易委员会关于网络安全披露的评论信的回应:一项探索性研究
美国证券交易委员会(SEC)发布的网络安全意见函可要求公司在适当情况下披露有关其网络安全事件、风险和相应控制的额外或澄清信息。虽然以披露更多网络安全信息的形式回应意见信可以更好地向投资者表明公司的安全状况,并符合法规,但也可能因披露专有网络安全信息而使公司面临更高水平的网络安全风险。以2011年至2019年间发布的52封网络安全评论信及其不匹配的公司为样本,我们的研究结果表明,评论信公司按照美国证券交易委员会的要求,改变了对网络安全的披露。然而,正如在回应信日前后的短期累积异常回报所示,股市对这些回应的反应是负面的。我们的研究结果通过表明市场参与者可能不会对透明度做出积极反应来提供政策含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems will publish thoughtful, well developed articles that examine the rapidly evolving relationship between accounting and information technology. Articles may range from empirical to analytical, from practice-based to the development of new techniques, but must be related to problems facing the integration of accounting and information technology. The journal will address (but will not limit itself to) the following specific issues: control and auditability of information systems; management of information technology; artificial intelligence research in accounting; development issues in accounting and information systems; human factors issues related to information technology; development of theories related to information technology; methodological issues in information technology research; information systems validation; human–computer interaction research in accounting information systems. The journal welcomes and encourages articles from both practitioners and academicians.
期刊最新文献
Bridging the gap in talent: A framework for interdisciplinary research on autism spectrum disorder persons in accounting and information systems A scoping review of ChatGPT research in accounting and finance Digital transformation voluntary disclosure: Insights from leading European companies Understanding cybersecurity breach contagion effects: The role of the loss heuristic and internal controls Internal control risk disclosure, media coverage and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1