Adaptive structural audit processes as shaped by emerging technologies

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Accounting Information Systems Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100735
Navitha Singh Sewpersadh
{"title":"Adaptive structural audit processes as shaped by emerging technologies","authors":"Navitha Singh Sewpersadh","doi":"10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how audit firms integrate emerging technologies to transform traditional audit methodologies and enhance audit quality. Using a qualitative research approach, the findings highlight that centralized audit platforms streamline documentation, promote knowledge sharing, and facilitate more effective internal reviews. Advanced Data Analytics (ADAs) such as the General Ledger (GL) Analyzer, process mapping technologies, and data visualization platforms complement professional judgment and skepticism, ensuring that human expertise remains central to the audit process. However, regulatory lag and dual data governance frameworks challenges hinder the seamless adoption of data-centric audit practices. This study emphasizes the importance of audit-data team collaboration for managing large datasets, ensuring data quality, and mitigating the risks of noisy data and false positives. Scalable audit tools are essential to serve a broad client base while retaining the flexibility to address client-specific risks. The Adaptive Audit Ecosystem (AAE) is introduced as a theoretical contribution, conceptualizing the interaction between technology, human expertise, governance structures, and regulatory requirements. The AAE illustrates how emerging technologies augment traditional practices while preserving essential audit principles, such as professional skepticism, judgment, independence, and accountability. This study concludes by presenting a future research agenda within the People, Process, Technology, and Governance (PPTG) framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089525000119","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how audit firms integrate emerging technologies to transform traditional audit methodologies and enhance audit quality. Using a qualitative research approach, the findings highlight that centralized audit platforms streamline documentation, promote knowledge sharing, and facilitate more effective internal reviews. Advanced Data Analytics (ADAs) such as the General Ledger (GL) Analyzer, process mapping technologies, and data visualization platforms complement professional judgment and skepticism, ensuring that human expertise remains central to the audit process. However, regulatory lag and dual data governance frameworks challenges hinder the seamless adoption of data-centric audit practices. This study emphasizes the importance of audit-data team collaboration for managing large datasets, ensuring data quality, and mitigating the risks of noisy data and false positives. Scalable audit tools are essential to serve a broad client base while retaining the flexibility to address client-specific risks. The Adaptive Audit Ecosystem (AAE) is introduced as a theoretical contribution, conceptualizing the interaction between technology, human expertise, governance structures, and regulatory requirements. The AAE illustrates how emerging technologies augment traditional practices while preserving essential audit principles, such as professional skepticism, judgment, independence, and accountability. This study concludes by presenting a future research agenda within the People, Process, Technology, and Governance (PPTG) framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems will publish thoughtful, well developed articles that examine the rapidly evolving relationship between accounting and information technology. Articles may range from empirical to analytical, from practice-based to the development of new techniques, but must be related to problems facing the integration of accounting and information technology. The journal will address (but will not limit itself to) the following specific issues: control and auditability of information systems; management of information technology; artificial intelligence research in accounting; development issues in accounting and information systems; human factors issues related to information technology; development of theories related to information technology; methodological issues in information technology research; information systems validation; human–computer interaction research in accounting information systems. The journal welcomes and encourages articles from both practitioners and academicians.
期刊最新文献
Auditors’ decision-making aid for going concern audit opinions through machine learning analysis Website disclosure and financial performance: Evidence from U.S. hospitals using a textual analysis approach Artificial intelligence auditability and auditor readiness for auditing artificial intelligence systems Adaptive structural audit processes as shaped by emerging technologies Application of consumer search volume in auditing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1