{"title":"Artificial intelligence auditability and auditor readiness for auditing artificial intelligence systems","authors":"Yueqi Li , Sanjay Goel","doi":"10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the business community races to implement artificial intelligence (AI), there are several challenges that need to be addressed such as fairness and biases, transparency, denial of individual rights, and dilution of privacy. AI audits are expected to ensure that AI systems function lawfully, robustly, and follow ethical standards (e.g., fairness). While the auditability for financial audits and information system audits has been well addressed in the literature, auditability of AI systems has not been sufficiently addressed. AI auditability and auditors’ competencies are crucial for ensuring AI audits are conducted with high quality. Research on the auditability of AI and the competencies of AI auditors is gravely lacking leaving risks in AI systems unmitigated. The primary reason is that the field is nascent and the rapid growth has left the audit profession struggling to catch up. Foundational work on establishing parameters for such research would help advance this research. In this paper, we explore AI auditability measures and competencies required for conducting AI audits. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 23 experienced AI professionals who have direct involvement or indirect exposure to AI audits. Based on our findings, we propose a framework of AI auditability and identify the competencies required to conduct AI audits. Our study serves as the first formal attempt to systematically identify and classify auditability measures and auditors’ expertise demanded for AI audits based on practitioners’ perspectives. Our findings contribute to the AI audit literature, inform AI developers about implementing auditability, guide the training of new AI auditors, and establish a foundation for further research in the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089525000156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the business community races to implement artificial intelligence (AI), there are several challenges that need to be addressed such as fairness and biases, transparency, denial of individual rights, and dilution of privacy. AI audits are expected to ensure that AI systems function lawfully, robustly, and follow ethical standards (e.g., fairness). While the auditability for financial audits and information system audits has been well addressed in the literature, auditability of AI systems has not been sufficiently addressed. AI auditability and auditors’ competencies are crucial for ensuring AI audits are conducted with high quality. Research on the auditability of AI and the competencies of AI auditors is gravely lacking leaving risks in AI systems unmitigated. The primary reason is that the field is nascent and the rapid growth has left the audit profession struggling to catch up. Foundational work on establishing parameters for such research would help advance this research. In this paper, we explore AI auditability measures and competencies required for conducting AI audits. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 23 experienced AI professionals who have direct involvement or indirect exposure to AI audits. Based on our findings, we propose a framework of AI auditability and identify the competencies required to conduct AI audits. Our study serves as the first formal attempt to systematically identify and classify auditability measures and auditors’ expertise demanded for AI audits based on practitioners’ perspectives. Our findings contribute to the AI audit literature, inform AI developers about implementing auditability, guide the training of new AI auditors, and establish a foundation for further research in the field.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems will publish thoughtful, well developed articles that examine the rapidly evolving relationship between accounting and information technology. Articles may range from empirical to analytical, from practice-based to the development of new techniques, but must be related to problems facing the integration of accounting and information technology. The journal will address (but will not limit itself to) the following specific issues: control and auditability of information systems; management of information technology; artificial intelligence research in accounting; development issues in accounting and information systems; human factors issues related to information technology; development of theories related to information technology; methodological issues in information technology research; information systems validation; human–computer interaction research in accounting information systems. The journal welcomes and encourages articles from both practitioners and academicians.