Using Factor Analysis as a Tool for Measuring the Quality of Life of University Students

Hayat Touati, Mohamed Guezgouz, Benkhaled Hadj, Djamel Mokrani
{"title":"Using Factor Analysis as a Tool for Measuring the Quality of Life of University Students","authors":"Hayat Touati, Mohamed Guezgouz, Benkhaled Hadj, Djamel Mokrani","doi":"10.2478/atd-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: The aim of this research is to design a tool (a scale) for measuring the quality of life of university students and to copy down its validity, use and reliability on six-dimension academic achievement: it touches family life quality, social life quality, personal happiness, life satisfaction and mental health. Methods: 963 male and female students from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, for the academic year 2018/2019 were exposed to the application of the model (factor analysis) and the reliability coefficient was reached by using Roland and Kettmann equation (.773) and Spearman-Brown (.776) and Cronbach’s Alpha (.629). Results: The feedbacks show that this tool for measuring ‘Quality of University Student Life’ is characterized and described as a good degree of stability. Discussion: When using “factor analysis” tool, we conclude that the exit dimensions focus on two basic axes: the first axis related to public health, quality of education, Family life, life satisfaction, and mental health. The second one consists of the quality of social life and personal happiness. Since these results have given a good degree to some extent, we were commended for working in favour of this tool (a scale) to judge the life quality of university students majoring in psychology faculty at the university. Limitations: The research and the questionnaire of the tool were applied to a group of psychology students at the national level which includes 963 male and female students with a percentage of 23.98%. The questions of this tool were tested on a sample of 963 students at the national level who were randomly chosen from various disciplines of master’s degree in psychology. Research was conducted during the academic year 2018/2019. Conclusions: The targeted instrument designed in this research which is “the factor analysis” has achieves a good validity and stability and has driven to two basic scales.","PeriodicalId":113905,"journal":{"name":"Acta Educationis Generalis","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Educationis Generalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The aim of this research is to design a tool (a scale) for measuring the quality of life of university students and to copy down its validity, use and reliability on six-dimension academic achievement: it touches family life quality, social life quality, personal happiness, life satisfaction and mental health. Methods: 963 male and female students from the Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, for the academic year 2018/2019 were exposed to the application of the model (factor analysis) and the reliability coefficient was reached by using Roland and Kettmann equation (.773) and Spearman-Brown (.776) and Cronbach’s Alpha (.629). Results: The feedbacks show that this tool for measuring ‘Quality of University Student Life’ is characterized and described as a good degree of stability. Discussion: When using “factor analysis” tool, we conclude that the exit dimensions focus on two basic axes: the first axis related to public health, quality of education, Family life, life satisfaction, and mental health. The second one consists of the quality of social life and personal happiness. Since these results have given a good degree to some extent, we were commended for working in favour of this tool (a scale) to judge the life quality of university students majoring in psychology faculty at the university. Limitations: The research and the questionnaire of the tool were applied to a group of psychology students at the national level which includes 963 male and female students with a percentage of 23.98%. The questions of this tool were tested on a sample of 963 students at the national level who were randomly chosen from various disciplines of master’s degree in psychology. Research was conducted during the academic year 2018/2019. Conclusions: The targeted instrument designed in this research which is “the factor analysis” has achieves a good validity and stability and has driven to two basic scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用因子分析法测量大学生生活质量
摘要:本研究的目的是设计一种衡量大学生生活质量的工具(量表),并将其效度、使用度和信度复制到六个维度的学业成就上:涉及家庭生活质量、社会生活质量、个人幸福感、生活满意度和心理健康。方法:对2018/2019学年心理学系社会科学学院963名男女学生进行因子分析,采用Roland and Kettmann方程(.773)、Spearman-Brown方程(.776)和Cronbach 's Alpha(.629)求得信度系数。结果:反馈表明,这一衡量“大学生生活质量”的工具具有良好的稳定性。讨论:当使用“因素分析”工具时,我们得出结论,退出维度集中在两个基本轴上:第一个轴与公共卫生、教育质量、家庭生活、生活满意度和心理健康有关。二是社会生活质量和个人幸福感。由于这些结果在一定程度上给出了良好的程度,因此我们赞成使用这个工具(一个量表)来判断大学心理学专业的大学生的生活质量,这受到了赞扬。局限性:本研究及工具问卷均应用于全国心理学专业学生,共963名男女学生,占23.98%。该工具的问题在963名全国水平的学生中进行了测试,这些学生是从心理学硕士学位的各个学科中随机抽取的。研究在2018/2019学年进行。结论:本研究设计的目标工具“因子分析”取得了良好的效度和稳定性,并驱动到两个基本量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Interdisciplinary Pictorial Material of Greek Religious Textbooks - A Chance to Meet the Otherness Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in a Principles of Economics Textbook Investigating the Relationships between Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms (OCS) and Depression Symptoms and Intolerance of Uncertainty in Turkish Adolescents during Covid-19 Musical Art Distance Education after Pandemic A Framework for Implementing Positive Learner Discipline in Public Secondary Schools from the Context of the Mpumalanga Province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1