Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in a Principles of Economics Textbook

Matthew Metzgar
{"title":"Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in a Principles of Economics Textbook","authors":"Matthew Metzgar","doi":"10.2478/atd-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Among the contemporary models developed, the updated Bloom’s taxonomy has become the most widely used cognitive process model for gauging learning questions. This model emphasizes the cognitive levels starting from remembering information and progresses to advanced levels such as producing knowledge. Even though students use a variety of strategies to synthesize information and learn, there is an urgent need for teachers to adopt better pedagogies to facilitate meaningful learning. Adams (2015) established that Bloom’s taxonomy places emphasis on student’s ability to acquire prior knowledge before interpreting or applying it into a real-world scenario. It is of interest then to determine the Bloom’s levels in principles of economics textbooks. Methods: This study utilized qualitative research to determine whether the aspects of Bloom’s revised taxonomy were utilized in end of chapter questions. The questions at the end of the chapters of the “Principles of Economics” by Gregory Mankiw (2021) were classified based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Results: The study revealed that most of the questions utilized the apply level of Bloom’s cognitive domain. There were few questions regarding evaluation or creating. Discussion: Faculty need to be aware of the different Bloom’s levels available to them and potentially focus more on the higher levels of Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Limitations: One limitation is that only the leading Principles of Economics textbook was surveyed. Other textbooks may produce different results. Conclusions: The leading Principles of Economics textbook had many end-of-chapter questions at the apply level of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. There may be opportunities to develop more questions at the higher levels of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy.","PeriodicalId":113905,"journal":{"name":"Acta Educationis Generalis","volume":"1 1","pages":"15 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Educationis Generalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Among the contemporary models developed, the updated Bloom’s taxonomy has become the most widely used cognitive process model for gauging learning questions. This model emphasizes the cognitive levels starting from remembering information and progresses to advanced levels such as producing knowledge. Even though students use a variety of strategies to synthesize information and learn, there is an urgent need for teachers to adopt better pedagogies to facilitate meaningful learning. Adams (2015) established that Bloom’s taxonomy places emphasis on student’s ability to acquire prior knowledge before interpreting or applying it into a real-world scenario. It is of interest then to determine the Bloom’s levels in principles of economics textbooks. Methods: This study utilized qualitative research to determine whether the aspects of Bloom’s revised taxonomy were utilized in end of chapter questions. The questions at the end of the chapters of the “Principles of Economics” by Gregory Mankiw (2021) were classified based on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Results: The study revealed that most of the questions utilized the apply level of Bloom’s cognitive domain. There were few questions regarding evaluation or creating. Discussion: Faculty need to be aware of the different Bloom’s levels available to them and potentially focus more on the higher levels of Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Limitations: One limitation is that only the leading Principles of Economics textbook was surveyed. Other textbooks may produce different results. Conclusions: The leading Principles of Economics textbook had many end-of-chapter questions at the apply level of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. There may be opportunities to develop more questions at the higher levels of the revised Bloom’s taxonomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学原理》教科书中的修订版布鲁姆分类法
摘要 导言:在当代已开发的模型中,更新版布鲁姆分类法已成为衡量学习问题最广泛使用的认知过程模型。该模型强调从记忆信息开始的认知水平,进而发展到产生知识等高级水平。尽管学生使用各种策略来综合信息和学习,但教师仍迫切需要采用更好的教学法来促进有意义的学习。Adams(2015)认为,布卢姆分类法强调学生在将已有知识解释或应用到现实世界场景中之前获取知识的能力。因此,确定经济学原理教科书中的布卢姆等级是有意义的。研究方法本研究采用定性研究的方法,以确定布卢姆修订版分类法的各个方面是否被用于章末问题中。根据布卢姆修订版分类法,对格雷戈里-曼基(Gregory Mankiw,2021 年)所著《经济学原理》各章结尾的问题进行了分类。研究结果研究表明,大多数问题都采用了布鲁姆认知领域的应用水平。有关评价或创造的问题很少。讨论教师需要了解布卢姆分类法的不同层次,并有可能更多地关注布卢姆分类法修订版的较高层次。局限性:局限性之一是只调查了主要的《经济学原理》教科书。其他教科书可能会产生不同的结果。结论:主要的《经济学原理》教科书中有许多章末问题属于布卢姆分类法修订版的应用水平。可能有机会在修订版布鲁姆分类法的更高层次上开发更多问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Interdisciplinary Pictorial Material of Greek Religious Textbooks - A Chance to Meet the Otherness Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in a Principles of Economics Textbook Investigating the Relationships between Obsessive Compulsive Symptoms (OCS) and Depression Symptoms and Intolerance of Uncertainty in Turkish Adolescents during Covid-19 Musical Art Distance Education after Pandemic A Framework for Implementing Positive Learner Discipline in Public Secondary Schools from the Context of the Mpumalanga Province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1