Experimental Comparison of Extrapolation Techniques for 24-Hours Electromagnetic Fields Human Exposure Evaluation to UMTS and LTE Base Stations

A. Bernieri, G. Betta, G. Cerro, G. Miele, D. Capriglione
{"title":"Experimental Comparison of Extrapolation Techniques for 24-Hours Electromagnetic Fields Human Exposure Evaluation to UMTS and LTE Base Stations","authors":"A. Bernieri, G. Betta, G. Cerro, G. Miele, D. Capriglione","doi":"10.1109/IWMN.2019.8805029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The compliance of cellular base stations electromagnetic field emissions with 24-hours exposure limits generally requires adopting suitable extrapolation techniques able to provide an upper boundary to the emitted power. As for 3rd and 4th generation cellular systems, the technical standards describing the related measurement methods allows using either Spectrum Analyzers or Vector Spectrum Analyzers. The latter ones are preferable because of their enhanced capability to isolate the single base station contributions. Nevertheless, Spectrum Analyzers are the most widespread measurement instruments adopted by technician operating in such a framework. Therefore, it could be useful to quantify the expected overestimation with respect to the Vector-type instruments. To this aim, in this paper an experimental comparison between the results achieved by applying extrapolation techniques with both acquisition devices is performed. To verify the results’ repeatability, such analyses have been carried out in different hours of the day and in different days. Our findings prove how Spectrum Analyzers generally overestimate the electric field magnitude with respect to Vector Analyzers even if different behaviors have been observed with respect to the different cellular systems.","PeriodicalId":272577,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2019.8805029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The compliance of cellular base stations electromagnetic field emissions with 24-hours exposure limits generally requires adopting suitable extrapolation techniques able to provide an upper boundary to the emitted power. As for 3rd and 4th generation cellular systems, the technical standards describing the related measurement methods allows using either Spectrum Analyzers or Vector Spectrum Analyzers. The latter ones are preferable because of their enhanced capability to isolate the single base station contributions. Nevertheless, Spectrum Analyzers are the most widespread measurement instruments adopted by technician operating in such a framework. Therefore, it could be useful to quantify the expected overestimation with respect to the Vector-type instruments. To this aim, in this paper an experimental comparison between the results achieved by applying extrapolation techniques with both acquisition devices is performed. To verify the results’ repeatability, such analyses have been carried out in different hours of the day and in different days. Our findings prove how Spectrum Analyzers generally overestimate the electric field magnitude with respect to Vector Analyzers even if different behaviors have been observed with respect to the different cellular systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人体对UMTS和LTE基站24小时电磁场暴露评估外推技术的实验比较
蜂窝基站电磁场发射要符合24小时暴露限值,一般需要采用能够提供发射功率上限的适当外推技术。至于第三代和第四代蜂窝系统,描述相关测量方法的技术标准允许使用频谱分析仪或矢量频谱分析仪。后一种是可取的,因为它们增强了隔离单个基站贡献的能力。然而,频谱分析仪是在这种框架下操作的技术人员采用的最广泛的测量仪器。因此,量化相对于矢量型工具的预期高估可能是有用的。为此,本文对两种采集设备应用外推技术所获得的结果进行了实验比较。为了验证结果的可重复性,这些分析在一天中的不同时间和不同日期进行。我们的研究结果证明了频谱分析仪通常是如何高估相对于矢量分析仪的电场大小的,即使在不同的蜂窝系统中观察到不同的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a Novel Measurement Technique for Emulating Real Life Environment within a Semi Reverberating Chamber Indoor Location Services through Multi-Source Learning-based Radio Fingerprinting Techniques Passive Peak Voltage Sensor for Multiple Sending Coils Inductive Power Transmission System Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Networks A measurement procedure for the optimization of a distributed indoor localization system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1