The Development of Instrument for Evaluating The Process of Strengthening Religion Ideology

J. Subando, B. Kartowagiran, S. Munadi
{"title":"The Development of Instrument for Evaluating The Process of Strengthening Religion Ideology","authors":"J. Subando, B. Kartowagiran, S. Munadi","doi":"10.1145/3452144.3452207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to develop an instrument for evaluating the process of strengthening ideology. The research begins with a review of the quality of teacher-student interaction and comprehensive method in value education for the basis of item development. The developed item was validated by 11 experts and was tested limitedly at Al-Irsyad Purwokerto Junior High School by involving 165 students and then expanded at other Junior High Schools in Al Irsyad Cirebon, Surakarta, and Banyuwangi by involving 222 students. Expert assessment data were analyzed by using Aiken's formula, limited trial data were analyzed by factor analysis, and expanded trial data were analyzed by CFA. The research result shows that the factor loading (FL) aspect of emotional support is at the lowest of 0.649 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7484 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,402 (>1.96 for α=5%). The lowest FL value of the class management aspect is 0.546 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability is 0.7741 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 2,752 (>1.96). The FL value for the instructional support aspect is at the lowest of 0.656 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7652 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,496 (>1.96). Based on the results above, it can be concluded that the item of the ideology strengthening process instrument is valid and reliable so that it can be used as an evaluation tool for the process of strengthening ideology in school.","PeriodicalId":107308,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research aims to develop an instrument for evaluating the process of strengthening ideology. The research begins with a review of the quality of teacher-student interaction and comprehensive method in value education for the basis of item development. The developed item was validated by 11 experts and was tested limitedly at Al-Irsyad Purwokerto Junior High School by involving 165 students and then expanded at other Junior High Schools in Al Irsyad Cirebon, Surakarta, and Banyuwangi by involving 222 students. Expert assessment data were analyzed by using Aiken's formula, limited trial data were analyzed by factor analysis, and expanded trial data were analyzed by CFA. The research result shows that the factor loading (FL) aspect of emotional support is at the lowest of 0.649 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7484 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,402 (>1.96 for α=5%). The lowest FL value of the class management aspect is 0.546 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability is 0.7741 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 2,752 (>1.96). The FL value for the instructional support aspect is at the lowest of 0.656 (>0.5), the lowest composite reliability value is 0.7652 (>0.7), and the lowest t-value 3,496 (>1.96). Based on the results above, it can be concluded that the item of the ideology strengthening process instrument is valid and reliable so that it can be used as an evaluation tool for the process of strengthening ideology in school.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宗教思想建设过程评价工具的研制
本研究旨在开发一种评估意识形态强化过程的工具。研究首先回顾了价值教育中师生互动的质量和综合方法,作为项目开发的基础。开发的项目经过11位专家的验证,并在Al-Irsyad Purwokerto初中进行了有限的测试,涉及165名学生,然后扩展到Al-Irsyad Cirebon, Surakarta和Banyuwangi的其他初中,涉及222名学生。专家评价资料采用Aiken公式分析,有限试验资料采用因子分析,扩展试验资料采用CFA分析。研究结果表明,情绪支持因子负荷(FL)方面最低为0.649(>0.5),复合信度值最低为0.7484 (>0.7),t值最低为3402 (α=5%时>1.96)。班级管理方面最低FL值为0.546(>0.5),最低复合信度为0.7741(>0.7),最低t值为2752(>1.96)。教学支持方面的FL值最低为0.656(>0.5),复合信度值最低为0.7652 (>0.7),t值最低为3496(>1.96)。综上所述,意识形态强化过程量表项目是有效可靠的,可以作为学校意识形态强化过程的评价工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is the Android Digital Web Module based on Flipped Classroom Needed by Teachers and High School Students in Pati Distric during the Covid-19 Pandemic? The Readiness of Principal and Educators in Implementing Inclusive Education Policies Role of Parents in Improving Children's Fine Motor Skills at Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic Public Relations Management at Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali University Cilacap Indonesia Value Clarification Technique (VCT) models answered the challenge of demoralization in the face of globalization era 5.0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1