Comparing Teachers’ and Preservice Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Methods in Computer Science Education

A. Dengel, Rupert Gehrlein
{"title":"Comparing Teachers’ and Preservice Teachers’ Opinions on Teaching Methods in Computer Science Education","authors":"A. Dengel, Rupert Gehrlein","doi":"10.1145/3556787.3556866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching methods are a variety of pedagogical approaches that can be used by teachers to enable student learning in the classroom. While the efficiency of these methods largely depends on the characteristics of the individual learners and the classroom dynamics, the characteristics of the teachers and their opinions towards these methods determine the actual integration in the classroom. But an appropriate judgment on the suitability of these methods for different teaching situations needs years of practice, which is why preservice teachers’ opinions towards using these methods might differ from other teachers’ experiences. To address this mismatch in Computer Science Teacher Education, we replicated a study by Zendler et al. with 16 preservice teachers and compare the results in this article. Results indicate that preservice teachers have a more generally positive opinion towards the use of teaching methods in specific learning phases than experienced teachers, but also a lower range of preferences. Problem-based learning was found to be the best-ranked method for both, preservice and experienced teachers, while other methods’ evaluations differ. In particular, preservice teachers also prefer project work and programmed instruction. We conclude that teaching methods should be a part of Computer Science Teacher Education, not just in theory, but also in practice.","PeriodicalId":136039,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3556787.3556866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Teaching methods are a variety of pedagogical approaches that can be used by teachers to enable student learning in the classroom. While the efficiency of these methods largely depends on the characteristics of the individual learners and the classroom dynamics, the characteristics of the teachers and their opinions towards these methods determine the actual integration in the classroom. But an appropriate judgment on the suitability of these methods for different teaching situations needs years of practice, which is why preservice teachers’ opinions towards using these methods might differ from other teachers’ experiences. To address this mismatch in Computer Science Teacher Education, we replicated a study by Zendler et al. with 16 preservice teachers and compare the results in this article. Results indicate that preservice teachers have a more generally positive opinion towards the use of teaching methods in specific learning phases than experienced teachers, but also a lower range of preferences. Problem-based learning was found to be the best-ranked method for both, preservice and experienced teachers, while other methods’ evaluations differ. In particular, preservice teachers also prefer project work and programmed instruction. We conclude that teaching methods should be a part of Computer Science Teacher Education, not just in theory, but also in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机科学教育中教师与职前教师对教学方法的看法比较
教学方法是教师用来使学生在课堂上学习的各种教学方法。虽然这些方法的效率在很大程度上取决于学习者个人的特点和课堂动态,但教师的特点和他们对这些方法的看法决定了课堂上的实际整合。但是,要判断这些方法是否适合不同的教学情况,需要多年的实践,这就是为什么职前教师对使用这些方法的看法可能与其他教师的经验不同。为了解决计算机科学教师教育中的这种不匹配问题,我们复制了Zendler等人对16名职前教师的研究,并在本文中比较了结果。结果显示,职前教师在特定学习阶段对教学方法的使用比经验丰富的教师普遍持积极态度,但偏好范围也较低。基于问题的学习被发现是在职前和有经验的教师中排名最高的方法,而其他方法的评价则有所不同。特别是职前教师也更喜欢项目工作和程序化教学。我们认为,教学方法应该是计算机科学教师教育的一部分,不仅在理论上,而且在实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating Teachers’ Diagnostic and Intervention Skills in Debugging ”Roteco” - a Swiss teacher community for educational robotics Designing a Research Approach to Investigate Computer Science Student Teachers’ Beliefs on AI in School An Experience in Explicitly Training Pre-Service Early Childhood Teachers in Programming Concepts with ScratchJr Video Analysis of a Teacher’s Use of Notional Machines in an Introductory High School Electronic Textile Unit: A three-tier framework to capture notional machines in practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1