{"title":"Effectiveness of Student Learning Results using Group Investigation Method and Brainstorming on Expert System Currency","authors":"M. Ihsan, K. Rukun, F. Rizal, M. Ramadhan","doi":"10.2991/ICTVET-18.2019.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to (1) know the results of student learning using the group survey method (2) know the results of student learning using the brainstorming method (3) know the difference between the learning outcomes of students using Group Investigation research methods and brainstorming in courses on expert systems. The population of this research includes the students of the fourth semester of STMIK Amik Logika Medan's IT department, ie 134 students divided into 4 classes. The sample of this study is followed by 2 classes of classes A and B composed of 36 B composed of 34 students. The sampling in this study was conducted using a cluster sampling technique in which one class is treated with the group search method and the other class with a brainstorming method. Based on the above calculation, there is a significant difference from the student's learning outcomes in the expert system course methods for research methods and brainstorming, the learning outcomes using the upper group method. The results of the mean post-test using the group survey are 80.14 and the results after the test with the average brainstorming 77.94. Keywords—results of student learning; group investigation method; brainstorming method","PeriodicalId":339218,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICTVET-18.2019.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to (1) know the results of student learning using the group survey method (2) know the results of student learning using the brainstorming method (3) know the difference between the learning outcomes of students using Group Investigation research methods and brainstorming in courses on expert systems. The population of this research includes the students of the fourth semester of STMIK Amik Logika Medan's IT department, ie 134 students divided into 4 classes. The sample of this study is followed by 2 classes of classes A and B composed of 36 B composed of 34 students. The sampling in this study was conducted using a cluster sampling technique in which one class is treated with the group search method and the other class with a brainstorming method. Based on the above calculation, there is a significant difference from the student's learning outcomes in the expert system course methods for research methods and brainstorming, the learning outcomes using the upper group method. The results of the mean post-test using the group survey are 80.14 and the results after the test with the average brainstorming 77.94. Keywords—results of student learning; group investigation method; brainstorming method
本研究旨在(1)使用小组调查法了解学生学习的结果(2)使用头脑风暴法了解学生学习的结果(3)了解在专家系统课程中使用小组调查研究方法和头脑风暴方法的学生学习结果的区别。本研究的人群包括STMIK Amik Logika Medan IT系第四学期的学生,即134名学生,分为4个班。本研究的样本依次为A班和B班2个班,共36个班,B班共34名学生。本研究的抽样采用整群抽样技术,其中一个班级采用群体搜索法,另一个班级采用头脑风暴法。基于以上计算,采用专家系统课程方法的学生的学习成果与采用研究法和头脑风暴法的学生的学习成果存在显著差异,采用上组法的学生的学习成果存在显著差异。小组调查后测均值为80.14,头脑风暴后测均值为77.94。关键词:学生学习效果;小组调查法;头脑风暴法