A Study on Meta-evaluation of Public Organizations Performance Evaluation: Based on Public Value Management

Eun-hye Ju
{"title":"A Study on Meta-evaluation of Public Organizations Performance Evaluation: Based on Public Value Management","authors":"Eun-hye Ju","doi":"10.55795/jpc.2023.2.1.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of publicness pursued by public institutions is difficult to present simply and clearly with a profit and loss statement such as the ‘bottom line’ used by private companies. Nevertheless, the current performance evaluation system of public institutions does not fully consider the characteristics of public projects and policies. Critical discussions are being raised in that it focuses only on the measurement of profitability creation based on short-term performance. \nAccordingly, this study conducted a meta-evaluation of the overall management evaluation system by applying the perspective of public value management to achieve the mission of creating public value, which is the essential purpose of the establishment and operation of public institutions. An overall review was conducted in terms of the content of public value management. The purpose of evaluation, subject of evaluation, management capacity, governance, performance, and implications for the direction of supplementation were drawn.","PeriodicalId":211752,"journal":{"name":"Korea Public Choice Association","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Public Choice Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55795/jpc.2023.2.1.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of publicness pursued by public institutions is difficult to present simply and clearly with a profit and loss statement such as the ‘bottom line’ used by private companies. Nevertheless, the current performance evaluation system of public institutions does not fully consider the characteristics of public projects and policies. Critical discussions are being raised in that it focuses only on the measurement of profitability creation based on short-term performance. Accordingly, this study conducted a meta-evaluation of the overall management evaluation system by applying the perspective of public value management to achieve the mission of creating public value, which is the essential purpose of the establishment and operation of public institutions. An overall review was conducted in terms of the content of public value management. The purpose of evaluation, subject of evaluation, management capacity, governance, performance, and implications for the direction of supplementation were drawn.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于公共价值管理的公共组织绩效评价元评价研究
公共机构所追求的公共性表现,很难用像私营公司所使用的“底线”那样的损益表来简单明了地表述。然而,目前的事业单位绩效评价体系并没有充分考虑公共项目和公共政策的特点。它只关注以短期业绩为基础的盈利能力创造的衡量,因此引发了批评的讨论。据此,本研究运用公共价值管理的视角对整个管理评价体系进行了元评价,以实现创造公共价值的使命,这是事业单位建立和运行的本质目的。就公共价值管理的内容进行全面检讨。总结了评价的目的、评价的主体、管理能力、治理、绩效以及对补充方向的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Issues of Legaltech Industrialization and the Importance of Limiting Rent Seeking to Public Choice Homo Economicus and the Theory of Public Choice: J. Buchanan vs. E. Ostrom A Study on Meta-evaluation of Public Organizations Performance Evaluation: Based on Public Value Management Analysis of Expected Financial Problems under Consolidation of Metropolitan Local Governments: In the Case of Daegu Metropolitan City Public Choice School’s Response to Austrian Business Cycle Theory: ABCT versus PBCT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1