The Concept

Shreya Atrey
{"title":"The Concept","authors":"Shreya Atrey","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198848950.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how intersectional discrimination has been understood in discrimination law. The analysis reveals that courts across jurisdictions have understood this category of discrimination not only as a matter of intersectionality, but also in various other ways, such as single-axis discrimination, multiple discrimination, additive discrimination, embedded discrimination, and compound discrimination. The chapter considers the relative position of these categories along a continuum and maps the qualitative differences between them as against the category of intersectional discrimination. It argues that the differences matter diagnostically in that only the category of intersectional discrimination properly so called, explains the causality in intersectional discrimination based on multiple grounds.","PeriodicalId":115138,"journal":{"name":"Intersectional Discrimination","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersectional Discrimination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848950.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines how intersectional discrimination has been understood in discrimination law. The analysis reveals that courts across jurisdictions have understood this category of discrimination not only as a matter of intersectionality, but also in various other ways, such as single-axis discrimination, multiple discrimination, additive discrimination, embedded discrimination, and compound discrimination. The chapter considers the relative position of these categories along a continuum and maps the qualitative differences between them as against the category of intersectional discrimination. It argues that the differences matter diagnostically in that only the category of intersectional discrimination properly so called, explains the causality in intersectional discrimination based on multiple grounds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这个概念
本章考察了在反歧视法中如何理解交叉歧视。分析表明,各司法管辖区的法院不仅将这类歧视理解为交叉性问题,而且还以各种其他方式理解,如单轴歧视、多重歧视、附加歧视、嵌入歧视和复合歧视。本章考虑了这些类别沿连续体的相对位置,并绘制了它们之间的质的差异,而不是交叉歧视的类别。它认为,这些差异在诊断上很重要,因为只有所谓的交叉歧视类别才能解释基于多种理由的交叉歧视的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion The Concept The Theory The Project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1