{"title":"Talking shop - linking training to factory indicators","authors":"S. Wilson","doi":"10.1109/ISSM.2001.962925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mean time to repair, mean time to repeat failure/repair, time to first failure after PM (preventative maintenance), and tool availability - the need to link these topics to training and other performance interventions is becoming paramount. How do we know that the time a technician spends in training (or other performance intervention) is worth it? As Intel continuously strives for improvement, departments are asked to prove their impact in terms of business/factory pay-offs. This paper discusses a successful project at Intel in which training was evaluated in terms of equipment indicator improvements, namely: average availability increase across AWX (Automated Wet Station/Bench) tools of 4.25% (which equated /spl sim/8 additional hours of production time/week).Variation in availability declined by an average 4.4% across the AWX tools.","PeriodicalId":356225,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing. ISSM 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37203)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing. ISSM 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37203)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSM.2001.962925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mean time to repair, mean time to repeat failure/repair, time to first failure after PM (preventative maintenance), and tool availability - the need to link these topics to training and other performance interventions is becoming paramount. How do we know that the time a technician spends in training (or other performance intervention) is worth it? As Intel continuously strives for improvement, departments are asked to prove their impact in terms of business/factory pay-offs. This paper discusses a successful project at Intel in which training was evaluated in terms of equipment indicator improvements, namely: average availability increase across AWX (Automated Wet Station/Bench) tools of 4.25% (which equated /spl sim/8 additional hours of production time/week).Variation in availability declined by an average 4.4% across the AWX tools.