{"title":"Talking shop - linking training to factory indicators","authors":"S. Wilson","doi":"10.1109/ISSM.2001.962925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mean time to repair, mean time to repeat failure/repair, time to first failure after PM (preventative maintenance), and tool availability - the need to link these topics to training and other performance interventions is becoming paramount. How do we know that the time a technician spends in training (or other performance intervention) is worth it? As Intel continuously strives for improvement, departments are asked to prove their impact in terms of business/factory pay-offs. This paper discusses a successful project at Intel in which training was evaluated in terms of equipment indicator improvements, namely: average availability increase across AWX (Automated Wet Station/Bench) tools of 4.25% (which equated /spl sim/8 additional hours of production time/week).Variation in availability declined by an average 4.4% across the AWX tools.","PeriodicalId":356225,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing. ISSM 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37203)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing. ISSM 2001. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37203)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSM.2001.962925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mean time to repair, mean time to repeat failure/repair, time to first failure after PM (preventative maintenance), and tool availability - the need to link these topics to training and other performance interventions is becoming paramount. How do we know that the time a technician spends in training (or other performance intervention) is worth it? As Intel continuously strives for improvement, departments are asked to prove their impact in terms of business/factory pay-offs. This paper discusses a successful project at Intel in which training was evaluated in terms of equipment indicator improvements, namely: average availability increase across AWX (Automated Wet Station/Bench) tools of 4.25% (which equated /spl sim/8 additional hours of production time/week).Variation in availability declined by an average 4.4% across the AWX tools.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将培训与工厂指标联系起来
平均维修时间,重复故障/维修的平均时间,PM(预防性维护)后首次故障的时间,以及工具可用性——将这些主题与培训和其他性能干预联系起来的需求变得至关重要。我们如何知道技术人员花在培训(或其他绩效干预)上的时间是值得的?随着英特尔不断努力改进,各部门被要求证明他们在业务/工厂回报方面的影响。本文讨论了英特尔的一个成功项目,在该项目中,培训是根据设备指标改进进行评估的,即:AWX(自动湿站/工作台)工具的平均可用性提高了4.25%(相当于/ sp1 sim/8小时/周的额外生产时间)。AWX工具的可用性差异平均下降了4.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The practical use of residual gas analysis in a semiconductor thermal processing module Dynamical control method of AMHS for multi-production lines Multi-wafer rapid isothermal processing Remote equipment diagnosis for metal etching process Resource conservation of buffered HF in semiconductor manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1