{"title":"A Compromise Approach to the Measurement of Pro-Poorness","authors":"S. Chakravarty, N. Chattopadhyay","doi":"10.25071/1874-6322.40547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growth vector is often considered as pro-poor if it generates a reductionin poverty. A second approach to pro-poorness states that growth shouldbe higher for the poor than for the non-poor. In this article, we develop ananalytical approach by considering a compromise between these two notionsof pro-poorness.","PeriodicalId":142300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Income Distribution®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Income Distribution®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A growth vector is often considered as pro-poor if it generates a reductionin poverty. A second approach to pro-poorness states that growth shouldbe higher for the poor than for the non-poor. In this article, we develop ananalytical approach by considering a compromise between these two notionsof pro-poorness.