{"title":"Axioms and Intuitions about Societal Inequality","authors":"Samuel Bowles, Wendy Carlin","doi":"10.25071/1874-6322.40591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that Corrado Gini’s “concentration ratio” is an informative measure of experienced inequality that (as he pointed out) varies from one (his “maximum concentration”) to zero (“minimum concentration”), a feature that does not hold (except in infinite populations) for the measure advocated in the contribution to this symposium by our colleague, Debraj Ray. Through a social network representation of inequality and a series of examples, we clarify the differing intuitions about the nature of inequality that alternative measures of inequality capture. ","PeriodicalId":142300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Income Distribution®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Income Distribution®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We show that Corrado Gini’s “concentration ratio” is an informative measure of experienced inequality that (as he pointed out) varies from one (his “maximum concentration”) to zero (“minimum concentration”), a feature that does not hold (except in infinite populations) for the measure advocated in the contribution to this symposium by our colleague, Debraj Ray. Through a social network representation of inequality and a series of examples, we clarify the differing intuitions about the nature of inequality that alternative measures of inequality capture.