La cité grecque entre Aristote et les modernes

Pierre Fröhlich
{"title":"La cité grecque entre Aristote et les modernes","authors":"Pierre Fröhlich","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2016.1863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on a famous passage from Book III of Aristotle’s Politics, which ties the status of citizen and the ability to participate in archè. Some historians have emphasised that such a definition of Greek citizenship had serious limitations. In particular, they have insisted on the part of religion in integrating men and women to citizenship. In front of those interpretative traditions, the paper proposes a return to the text and a new translation. Then it comes back to its potential uses by historians who study connections between archè and participation. Yet it concludes that one just cannot define the Greek citizenship in a single and global way.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2016.1863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This paper focuses on a famous passage from Book III of Aristotle’s Politics, which ties the status of citizen and the ability to participate in archè. Some historians have emphasised that such a definition of Greek citizenship had serious limitations. In particular, they have insisted on the part of religion in integrating men and women to citizenship. In front of those interpretative traditions, the paper proposes a return to the text and a new translation. Then it comes back to its potential uses by historians who study connections between archè and participation. Yet it concludes that one just cannot define the Greek citizenship in a single and global way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
位于亚里士多德和现代人之间的希腊城市
本文的重点是亚里士多德《政治学》第三卷中的一段著名的段落,它将公民的地位与参与archè的能力联系在一起。一些历史学家强调,这样一个希腊公民身份的定义有严重的局限性。特别是,他们坚持要求宗教在使男子和妇女成为公民方面发挥作用。面对这些解释传统,本文提出回归文本和一种新的翻译。然后,研究archè与参与之间联系的历史学家又回到了它的潜在用途。然而,它得出的结论是,人们无法以单一和全球的方式定义希腊公民身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virgile en Orient : formes et circulation de l’Énéide dans la Pars Orientis de l’Empire (Ier-VIe siècles) Paratextual readings of imperial discourse in the Res Gestae divi Augusti La suprématie auspiciale du prince en question(s). Une nouvelle hiérarchie des auspices La lex Calpurnia, le Sénat et les alliés de Rome L’appellation Caesaris (Uxor) dans les témoignages épigraphiques et littéraires sur Scribonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1