The Ethics of Virtual Sexual Assault

J. Danaher
{"title":"The Ethics of Virtual Sexual Assault","authors":"J. Danaher","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the growing problem of unwanted sexual interactions in virtual environments. It reviews the available evidence regarding the prevalence and severity of this problem. It then argues that due to the potential harms of such interactions, as well as their non-consensual nature, there is a good prima facie argument for viewing them as serious moral wrongs. Does this prima facie argument hold up to scrutiny? After considering three major objections (the ‘it’s not real’ objection, the ‘it’s just a game’ objection, and the ‘unrestricted consent’ objection), this chapter argues that it does. The chapter closes by reviewing some of the policy options available to us in addressing the problem of virtual sexual assault.","PeriodicalId":262957,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter addresses the growing problem of unwanted sexual interactions in virtual environments. It reviews the available evidence regarding the prevalence and severity of this problem. It then argues that due to the potential harms of such interactions, as well as their non-consensual nature, there is a good prima facie argument for viewing them as serious moral wrongs. Does this prima facie argument hold up to scrutiny? After considering three major objections (the ‘it’s not real’ objection, the ‘it’s just a game’ objection, and the ‘unrestricted consent’ objection), this chapter argues that it does. The chapter closes by reviewing some of the policy options available to us in addressing the problem of virtual sexual assault.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟性侵犯的道德规范
本章讨论了在虚拟环境中日益严重的不受欢迎的性互动问题。它回顾了关于这一问题的普遍性和严重性的现有证据。然后,它认为,由于这种互动的潜在危害,以及它们未经同意的性质,有一个很好的初步证据表明,将它们视为严重的道德错误。这种表面上的论点经得起推敲吗?在考虑了三种主要反对意见(“这不是真实的”反对意见,“这只是一款游戏”反对意见,以及“无限制同意”反对意见)后,本章认为它确实存在。本章最后回顾了我们在处理虚拟性侵犯问题时可用的一些政策选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ethics of Quitting Social Media The Ethics of Predictive Policing The Ethics of Virtual Sexual Assault Automation and the Future of Work The Ethics of Human–Robot Interaction and Traditional Moral Theories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1