Automation and the Future of Work

J. Danaher
{"title":"Automation and the Future of Work","authors":"J. Danaher","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in automation threaten to radically alter the workplace of the future. What implications does this have for the ethics of work? For better or worse, work plays a central role in distributing goods to people in the modern world. This includes the good of income, of course, but it also includes meaning-related goods such as a sense of purpose, mastery over some skill set, social contribution, and social status. Will automation rob large numbers of people of these goods too? What can be done to compensate them for these losses? Reviewing the possibilities, this chapter ultimately argues that the best way to mitigate these losses might be to transition to a post-work society.","PeriodicalId":262957,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"127","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 127

Abstract

Advances in automation threaten to radically alter the workplace of the future. What implications does this have for the ethics of work? For better or worse, work plays a central role in distributing goods to people in the modern world. This includes the good of income, of course, but it also includes meaning-related goods such as a sense of purpose, mastery over some skill set, social contribution, and social status. Will automation rob large numbers of people of these goods too? What can be done to compensate them for these losses? Reviewing the possibilities, this chapter ultimately argues that the best way to mitigate these losses might be to transition to a post-work society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动化和工作的未来
自动化的进步有可能从根本上改变未来的工作场所。这对工作伦理有什么影响?不管是好是坏,在现代社会,工作在向人们分配商品方面发挥着核心作用。当然,这包括收入带来的好处,但也包括与意义相关的好处,如使命感、对某些技能的掌握、社会贡献和社会地位。自动化也会抢走大量人的这些商品吗?怎样才能补偿他们的损失呢?回顾各种可能性,本章最终认为,减轻这些损失的最佳方式可能是过渡到后工作社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ethics of Quitting Social Media The Ethics of Predictive Policing The Ethics of Virtual Sexual Assault Automation and the Future of Work The Ethics of Human–Robot Interaction and Traditional Moral Theories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1