From Shangri-La to De facto SEZ: Land Grabs from “Below” in Sikkim, India

Mona Chettri
{"title":"From Shangri-La to De facto SEZ: Land Grabs from “Below” in Sikkim, India","authors":"Mona Chettri","doi":"10.1017/9789048551811.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sikkim in north-eastern India is a small border state strategically located between China, Nepal and Bhutan. Two decades of state-led investment in infrastructural development and private investment in hydropower and pharmaceutical industries has transformed Sikkim from a remote border state to a de-facto Special Economic Zone (SEZ) where incursions by private capital are masked under state-led development policies. The profusion of pharmaceutical factories and the concomitant corporate land grabs have led to the recalibration of peoples relations with land and the creation of a new layer of rural poor. The paper focuses on Setipool slum, east Sikkim located near two pharmaceutical factories to demonstrate the ways corporate land grabs have altered the relationships between people, land and the state in expected and unexpected ways. Ambiguous land rights and the establishment of pharmaceutical factories have led to spatially contained land booms in Setipool which replicate nexuses of illegality, claim-making and exclusions that are characteristic of corporate land grabs. Land grabs and different forms of intimate exclusions that have emerged within the slum challenge prior assumptions around local responses to corporate incursions and illustrates how even without dispossession, commodification of land can lead to different forms of access and exclusions.","PeriodicalId":391083,"journal":{"name":"Development Zones in Asian Borderlands","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Zones in Asian Borderlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048551811.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Sikkim in north-eastern India is a small border state strategically located between China, Nepal and Bhutan. Two decades of state-led investment in infrastructural development and private investment in hydropower and pharmaceutical industries has transformed Sikkim from a remote border state to a de-facto Special Economic Zone (SEZ) where incursions by private capital are masked under state-led development policies. The profusion of pharmaceutical factories and the concomitant corporate land grabs have led to the recalibration of peoples relations with land and the creation of a new layer of rural poor. The paper focuses on Setipool slum, east Sikkim located near two pharmaceutical factories to demonstrate the ways corporate land grabs have altered the relationships between people, land and the state in expected and unexpected ways. Ambiguous land rights and the establishment of pharmaceutical factories have led to spatially contained land booms in Setipool which replicate nexuses of illegality, claim-making and exclusions that are characteristic of corporate land grabs. Land grabs and different forms of intimate exclusions that have emerged within the slum challenge prior assumptions around local responses to corporate incursions and illustrates how even without dispossession, commodification of land can lead to different forms of access and exclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从香格里拉到事实上的经济特区:印度锡金从“下面”攫取土地
锡金位于印度东北部,是一个位于中国、尼泊尔和不丹之间的边境小国。20年来,国家主导的基础设施建设投资以及水电和制药行业的私人投资,已将锡金从一个偏远的边境国家转变为事实上的经济特区,在这里,私人资本的入侵被国家主导的发展政策所掩盖。大量的制药厂和随之而来的企业对土地的掠夺导致了人们与土地关系的重新调整,并创造了一个新的农村贫困阶层。本文以锡金东部靠近两家制药厂的Setipool贫民窟为例,展示了企业对土地的攫取如何以预期和意外的方式改变了人、土地和国家之间的关系。含糊不清的土地权利和制药厂的建立导致了塞蒂普尔在空间上的土地繁荣,这复制了非法、索赔和排斥的联系,这些都是公司土地掠夺的特征。在贫民窟中出现的土地掠夺和不同形式的亲密排斥挑战了关于当地对公司入侵的反应的先前假设,并说明即使没有剥夺,土地商品化也会导致不同形式的获取和排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development Zones in Conflict-Affected Borderlands: The Case of Muse, Northern Shan State, Myanmar From Shangri-La to De facto SEZ: Land Grabs from “Below” in Sikkim, India Post-disaster Development Zones and Dry Ports as Geopolitical Infrastructures in Nepal Casinos as Special Zones Development Zones in Conflict-Affected Borderlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1