Philosophie et pouvoir royal dans la pensée d’Isocrate et de Platon. Le règne de l’expert politique

Panos Christodoulou
{"title":"Philosophie et pouvoir royal dans la pensée d’Isocrate et de Platon. Le règne de l’expert politique","authors":"Panos Christodoulou","doi":"10.3406/ccgg.2016.1864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the first part of this article, we aim to study the emergence, during the Athenian democracy of the first half of the fourth century, of a unique corpus of texts dedicated to the figure of the political expert. We argue that in treatises such as the Republic and the Statesman of Plato, the Cypriot Discourses of Isocrates (To Nicocles, Nicocles, Evagoras) and the Cyropaedia and the Agesilas of Xenophon, the fulfilment of the outstanding political expert is related to a specific political system : kingship. In the second part, we argue that Plato and Isocrates engaged in an intellectual dialogue which reveals, on the one hand, their common conception of the relationship between philosophy and royal power and, on the other hand, their profound disagreement on the practical aspect of political art. We focus on texts where the true statesman, who embodies an ideal type of power manages to put into practice his political knowledge to administrate the city : The Republic and the Statesman of Plato, on the one hand, and the Cypriot Discourses of Isocrates, on the other. It is in these texts that the most profound disagreements between Isocrates and Plato appear.","PeriodicalId":170604,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ccgg.2016.1864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the first part of this article, we aim to study the emergence, during the Athenian democracy of the first half of the fourth century, of a unique corpus of texts dedicated to the figure of the political expert. We argue that in treatises such as the Republic and the Statesman of Plato, the Cypriot Discourses of Isocrates (To Nicocles, Nicocles, Evagoras) and the Cyropaedia and the Agesilas of Xenophon, the fulfilment of the outstanding political expert is related to a specific political system : kingship. In the second part, we argue that Plato and Isocrates engaged in an intellectual dialogue which reveals, on the one hand, their common conception of the relationship between philosophy and royal power and, on the other hand, their profound disagreement on the practical aspect of political art. We focus on texts where the true statesman, who embodies an ideal type of power manages to put into practice his political knowledge to administrate the city : The Republic and the Statesman of Plato, on the one hand, and the Cypriot Discourses of Isocrates, on the other. It is in these texts that the most profound disagreements between Isocrates and Plato appear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊索克拉底和柏拉图思想中的哲学和王权。政治专家的统治
在本文的第一部分中,我们的目标是研究在四世纪上半叶的雅典民主时期,一个致力于政治专家形象的独特文本语料库的出现。我们认为,在柏拉图的《理想国》和《政治家》、伊索克拉底的《塞浦路斯论述》(《给尼科克利斯、尼科克利斯、埃瓦戈拉斯》)以及色诺芬的《塞罗帕迪亚》和《阿格西拉》等论文中,杰出政治专家的成就与一个特定的政治制度有关:王权。在第二部分,我们认为柏拉图和伊索克拉底进行了一场智力对话,这一方面揭示了他们对哲学与王权之间关系的共同概念,另一方面,他们在政治艺术的实践方面存在深刻分歧。我们关注的是真正的政治家的文本,他们体现了一种理想的权力类型,设法将他的政治知识付诸实践来管理城市:一方面是柏拉图的《理想国》和《政治家》,另一方面是伊索克拉底的《塞浦路斯论述》。正是在这些文本中,伊索克拉底和柏拉图之间最深刻的分歧出现了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Virgile en Orient : formes et circulation de l’Énéide dans la Pars Orientis de l’Empire (Ier-VIe siècles) Paratextual readings of imperial discourse in the Res Gestae divi Augusti La suprématie auspiciale du prince en question(s). Une nouvelle hiérarchie des auspices La lex Calpurnia, le Sénat et les alliés de Rome L’appellation Caesaris (Uxor) dans les témoignages épigraphiques et littéraires sur Scribonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1