The Trauma and Development Education Monitor (TANDEM): et nytt instrument for å måle traumekompetanse

D. Nordanger, R. Gjestad, P. Solhaug, A. Andersen, M. Bræin, K. Johannessen, A. Lundegaard, S. Ormhaug, G. J. Andersson, J. Gran, G. Hafstad, T. Hanssen, V. A. Johansen, A. H. Simonsen, H. Steinkopf, E. Johansson
{"title":"The Trauma and Development Education Monitor (TANDEM): et nytt instrument for å måle traumekompetanse","authors":"D. Nordanger, R. Gjestad, P. Solhaug, A. Andersen, M. Bræin, K. Johannessen, A. Lundegaard, S. Ormhaug, G. J. Andersson, J. Gran, G. Hafstad, T. Hanssen, V. A. Johansen, A. H. Simonsen, H. Steinkopf, E. Johansson","doi":"10.52734/y6g8ru84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a need to assess whether the resources invested in building trauma competence in services actually lead to higher levels of competence. For this purpose, we have developed an instrument called the Trauma and Development Education Monitor (TANDEM). The present article presents the process behind developing the instrument and an initial study of its psychometric properties. The tested version consisted of 59 items distributed across the domains of readiness, agency, reflexivity, knowledge, practice and culture at work. Based on responses from 415 professionals in relevant services, concept and criterion validity was examined through reliability analyses, factor analyses and regression analyses. Based on the analyses, the tested version was reduced to 54 items in the final version, distributed across the same six domains. As dimensions, the domains generally showed good scale reliability, and for the final version factor analyses confirmed a one-dimensional model for all domains. The instrument discriminated between respondents who reported more versus less previously received trauma competence building and showed specificity as a measure of trauma versus more general competence. The results indicate that TANDEM has the potential to become a useful tool in endeavours to implement trauma competence in services, as well as in research activities in this field. Keywords: trauma, competence, instrument, validity","PeriodicalId":344686,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52734/y6g8ru84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a need to assess whether the resources invested in building trauma competence in services actually lead to higher levels of competence. For this purpose, we have developed an instrument called the Trauma and Development Education Monitor (TANDEM). The present article presents the process behind developing the instrument and an initial study of its psychometric properties. The tested version consisted of 59 items distributed across the domains of readiness, agency, reflexivity, knowledge, practice and culture at work. Based on responses from 415 professionals in relevant services, concept and criterion validity was examined through reliability analyses, factor analyses and regression analyses. Based on the analyses, the tested version was reduced to 54 items in the final version, distributed across the same six domains. As dimensions, the domains generally showed good scale reliability, and for the final version factor analyses confirmed a one-dimensional model for all domains. The instrument discriminated between respondents who reported more versus less previously received trauma competence building and showed specificity as a measure of trauma versus more general competence. The results indicate that TANDEM has the potential to become a useful tool in endeavours to implement trauma competence in services, as well as in research activities in this field. Keywords: trauma, competence, instrument, validity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤与发展教育监护仪(TANDEM):一种用于治疗创伤与发育障碍的新型仪器
有必要评估投入在服务中建立创伤能力的资源是否实际上导致了更高水平的能力。为此,我们开发了一种名为创伤与发展教育监测仪(TANDEM)的仪器。本文介绍了开发仪器背后的过程和对其心理测量特性的初步研究。测试版本包括59个项目,分布在准备程度、能动性、反身性、知识、实践和工作文化等领域。基于415名相关服务专业人员的反馈,通过信度分析、因子分析和回归分析对概念和标准的效度进行检验。根据分析,测试版本在最终版本中减少到54个项目,分布在相同的六个领域。作为维度,这些领域普遍表现出良好的尺度信度,因子分析最终证实了所有领域的一维模型。该工具对报告较多或较少先前接受创伤能力建设的受访者进行了区分,并显示了创伤与一般能力的特异性测量。结果表明,TANDEM有潜力成为在服务中实施创伤能力的有用工具,以及在该领域的研究活动中。关键词:创伤,能力,工具,效度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the 12-item video consultation self-efficacy scale Pilotprosjekt om pasientprofiler – et verktøy for klinisk erfaringsdeling Kartlegging av foreldrestil: et spørreskjema for empatibasert, følelsesbevisst foreldrekompetanse Norske politistudenters kunnskap om øyenvitners pålitelighet: en preliminær undersøkelse Nyttige faktorer for tilfriskning av anoreksi: spørreskjemaresultater fra pasienter og foreldre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1