Traumeinstrumentet Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale (MACE)

{"title":"Traumeinstrumentet Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale (MACE)","authors":"","doi":"10.52734/25zt89vx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale (MACE) trauma questionnaire\n\n\nBackground: A 55-item Norwegian version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scale was recently developed. For clinicians to apply MACE, they need to perceive the instrument as acceptable to patients and useful. We investigated clinicians’ experiences and views of the acceptability, usefulness and application of MACE. \n\nMethod: Twenty-three clinicians recorded their perceptions of how unpleasant it was for 84 adult patients to complete MACE, 20 clinicians answered a survey about MACE, and eight clinicians attended focus group interviews to detail their experiences and views. \n\nResults: According to the clinicians, the MACE form was sufficiently self-explanatory to function as a questionnaire. Clinicians considered MACE as emotionally tolerable for most patients. They reported that some patients had strong negative reactions but that these patients did not regret participating. The majority of clinicians found MACE to be useful. Based on their experiences, they proposed ways of utilising MACE in clinical practice.\n\nConclusion: MACE appears applicable and useful to clinicians in an outpatient setting. Possible negative patient reactions should be taken into account when administering the instrument.\n\nKeywords: MACE; trauma instrument; clinicians’ perceptions; acceptability, usefulness, application","PeriodicalId":344686,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52734/25zt89vx","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale (MACE) trauma questionnaire Background: A 55-item Norwegian version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE) scale was recently developed. For clinicians to apply MACE, they need to perceive the instrument as acceptable to patients and useful. We investigated clinicians’ experiences and views of the acceptability, usefulness and application of MACE. Method: Twenty-three clinicians recorded their perceptions of how unpleasant it was for 84 adult patients to complete MACE, 20 clinicians answered a survey about MACE, and eight clinicians attended focus group interviews to detail their experiences and views. Results: According to the clinicians, the MACE form was sufficiently self-explanatory to function as a questionnaire. Clinicians considered MACE as emotionally tolerable for most patients. They reported that some patients had strong negative reactions but that these patients did not regret participating. The majority of clinicians found MACE to be useful. Based on their experiences, they proposed ways of utilising MACE in clinical practice. Conclusion: MACE appears applicable and useful to clinicians in an outpatient setting. Possible negative patient reactions should be taken into account when administering the instrument. Keywords: MACE; trauma instrument; clinicians’ perceptions; acceptability, usefulness, application
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤器械虐待和虐待暴露年表(MACE)
背景:挪威版的《虐待和虐待暴露年表》(MACE)量表最近被开发出来,共有55个条目。临床医生要应用MACE,他们需要认为该仪器为患者所接受且有用。我们调查了临床医生对MACE的可接受性、有效性和应用的经验和看法。方法:23名临床医生记录了84名成年患者完成MACE的不愉快感受,20名临床医生回答了关于MACE的调查,8名临床医生参加了焦点小组访谈,详细介绍了他们的经历和观点。结果:根据临床医生,MACE表格足以解释作为问卷的功能。临床医生认为MACE对大多数患者在情绪上是可以忍受的。他们报告说,一些患者有强烈的负面反应,但这些患者并不后悔参加。大多数临床医生认为MACE是有用的。根据他们的经验,提出了在临床实践中应用MACE的方法。结论:MACE对临床医生在门诊环境中是适用和有用的。给药时应考虑到患者可能出现的不良反应。关键词:权杖;创伤仪器;临床医生的看法;可接受性、实用性、应用性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of the 12-item video consultation self-efficacy scale Pilotprosjekt om pasientprofiler – et verktøy for klinisk erfaringsdeling Kartlegging av foreldrestil: et spørreskjema for empatibasert, følelsesbevisst foreldrekompetanse Norske politistudenters kunnskap om øyenvitners pålitelighet: en preliminær undersøkelse Nyttige faktorer for tilfriskning av anoreksi: spørreskjemaresultater fra pasienter og foreldre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1