Participación del alumnado en la toma de decisiones: una experiencia de la justicia social en la Universidad - [Student participation in decision-making: an experience of social justice at the University]

Elena Amiguet, Margarita Fernández-Romero, Fernando Gómez-Gonzalvo, A. Martí, Carmen Muñoz-Herrera, Francisco Pardo
{"title":"Participación del alumnado en la toma de decisiones: una experiencia de la justicia social en la Universidad - [Student participation in decision-making: an experience of social justice at the University]","authors":"Elena Amiguet, Margarita Fernández-Romero, Fernando Gómez-Gonzalvo, A. Martí, Carmen Muñoz-Herrera, Francisco Pardo","doi":"10.26754/cinaic.2021.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- In recent decades, teaching work in all educational stages, including the university, has undergone a continuous process of transformation focused on educational innovation. This has occurred at a technological level and at a methodological level. Among the latter, a methodological perspective has been developed those questions, from the postulates of critical pedagogy, educational practices seeking higher levels of participation among students, justice and equality. In this work we start from Conell's positioning to attend to curricular justice, which is why an experience carried out during the 2019-2020 academic year is presented in two subjects of the fourth grade of primary education in which a curricular negotiation process was carried out that implied the contents of the subjects and the assessment systems. The results show that there is a positive assessment of the students towards this type of proposal, although significant differences have been found in the assessments according to the subject in which said proposal was made. These differences are due to various factors, including the type of subject (theoretical; practical), the teacher's explanations and his methodology in each subject. Despite this, a high motivation and participation has been found among the students.","PeriodicalId":369305,"journal":{"name":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovaciones docentes en tiempos de pandemia.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26754/cinaic.2021.0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

- In recent decades, teaching work in all educational stages, including the university, has undergone a continuous process of transformation focused on educational innovation. This has occurred at a technological level and at a methodological level. Among the latter, a methodological perspective has been developed those questions, from the postulates of critical pedagogy, educational practices seeking higher levels of participation among students, justice and equality. In this work we start from Conell's positioning to attend to curricular justice, which is why an experience carried out during the 2019-2020 academic year is presented in two subjects of the fourth grade of primary education in which a curricular negotiation process was carried out that implied the contents of the subjects and the assessment systems. The results show that there is a positive assessment of the students towards this type of proposal, although significant differences have been found in the assessments according to the subject in which said proposal was made. These differences are due to various factors, including the type of subject (theoretical; practical), the teacher's explanations and his methodology in each subject. Despite this, a high motivation and participation has been found among the students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生参与决策:大学社会公正的经验-[学生参与决策:大学社会公正的经验]
——近几十年来,包括大学在内的各个教育阶段的教学工作都经历了一个以教育创新为中心的持续变革过程。这发生在技术层面和方法层面。在后者中,从批判性教学法的假设、寻求学生更高水平参与的教育实践、正义和平等的角度,发展了一种方法观点。在这项工作中,我们从Conell的定位开始关注课程公平,这就是为什么在2019-2020学年期间在小学四年级的两个科目中进行的经验,其中进行了课程谈判过程,暗示了科目的内容和评估系统。结果表明,学生对这种类型的建议有积极的评价,尽管根据所述建议的主题的评估存在显着差异。这些差异是由各种因素造成的,包括学科类型(理论;实用),老师在每门课上的解释和方法。尽管如此,学生们的积极性和参与度都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The flipped classroom for Physics teaching Metodología para el desarrollo del pensamiento computacional en tiempos de COVID-19 - [Methodology for the development of Computational Thinking in times of COVID-19] Un modelo de aprendizaje servicio: sistema de ayuda al diseño y construcción de viviendas humildes con quincha como material estructural en Perú - [A service-learning model: an aid system for design and construction of low-cost quincha-made houses in Peru] Cuestionario para la selección de conceptos fundamentales: análisis de validez y confiabilidad - [Questionnaire for the selection of fundamental concepts: analysis of validity and reliability] El modelo semi-presencial y virtual a examen en el área de ingeniería - [Semi-presential and online scenarios under exam in engineering degrees]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1