Collaboration médecins généralistes – psychologues : où en est-on ?

Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psfr.2021.11.002
P. Vanneste , A. Néron
{"title":"Collaboration médecins généralistes – psychologues : où en est-on ?","authors":"P. Vanneste ,&nbsp;A. Néron","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A symposium organised in 2012 by the F.P.S Public Health, entitled “General practitioners and psychotherapists: health collaborators?” highlighted a desire for collaboration between general practitioners and psychologists, without being able to define the content or methods. Definitions of collaboration remain very vague and variable. The Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaboration defines collaboration as a practice in which health professionals work with other health professionals, the patient and his/her family. We could also define interprofessional collaboration as a system and practice of communication between different health professionals working together on the basis of common action. Thus collaboration cannot be dissociated from these actors, nor from its form, nor from its objective. The latter must be defined in terms of means, public health and population. Collaboration between general practitioners and psychologists is still at the draft stage in terms of operationality: the various studies do not allow us to bring an operational dimension to collaboration by answering the following five questions: Who are the actors of the collaboration? Why do they collaborate? How does the collaboration take place? Who is the beneficiary? And for what purpose(s) do they collaborate?</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298421000881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A symposium organised in 2012 by the F.P.S Public Health, entitled “General practitioners and psychotherapists: health collaborators?” highlighted a desire for collaboration between general practitioners and psychologists, without being able to define the content or methods. Definitions of collaboration remain very vague and variable. The Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaboration defines collaboration as a practice in which health professionals work with other health professionals, the patient and his/her family. We could also define interprofessional collaboration as a system and practice of communication between different health professionals working together on the basis of common action. Thus collaboration cannot be dissociated from these actors, nor from its form, nor from its objective. The latter must be defined in terms of means, public health and population. Collaboration between general practitioners and psychologists is still at the draft stage in terms of operationality: the various studies do not allow us to bring an operational dimension to collaboration by answering the following five questions: Who are the actors of the collaboration? Why do they collaborate? How does the collaboration take place? Who is the beneficiary? And for what purpose(s) do they collaborate?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
全科医生和心理学家的合作:现状如何?
2012年,公共卫生联合会举办了一场题为 "全科医生和心理治疗师:健康合作者?"的研讨会,强调了全科医生和心理学家之间合作的愿望,但却无法确定合作的内容或方法。关于合作的定义仍然非常模糊,而且多变。加拿大跨专业医疗合作组织将合作定义为医疗专业人员与其他医疗专业人员、病人及其家属合作的一种实践。我们也可以把跨专业合作定义为不同的医疗专业人员在共同行动的基础上进行合作的一种沟通系统和实践。因此,合作不能脱离这些参与者,也不能脱离其形式和目标。后者必须从手段、公共卫生和人口的角度来界定。就可操作性而言,全科医生与心理学家之间的合作仍处于草创阶段:各种研究无法让我们通过回答以下五个问题来为合作提供可操作性:谁是合作的参与者?他们为什么要合作?如何开展合作?谁是受益者?他们合作的目的是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1