A Preliminary Study on Global Constitutionalism

Jeonghun Bae
{"title":"A Preliminary Study on Global Constitutionalism","authors":"Jeonghun Bae","doi":"10.24324/kiacl.2022.28.3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the late twentieth century, with the end of the Cold War and the acceleration of globalization, discussions on “Global Constitutionalism”, an expanded understanding of modern constitutionalism, have emerged. Proponents of Global Constitutionalism argue that the specific principles of modern constitutionalism, such as guaranteeing human rights, separation of powers, the rule of law, democracy, and judicial review in the transnational human rights regime, can have global implications. Various criticisms have been raised against this argument based on the notions of the homogenous nation state, legal positivism, legal pluralism, etc. If, however, it is possible to establish constitutionalism grounded in constitutional pluralism, while responding to temporal and spatial particularities, the discussion on Global Constitutionalism should be valid and useful in explaining the changes in the field of international-transnational law in the twenty-first century. Further theoretical and practical groundwork is needed to realize the contents of Global Constitutionalism, but it is difficult to regard Global Constitutionalism as a completely unrealistic concept.","PeriodicalId":322578,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association of International Association of Constitutional Law","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association of International Association of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24324/kiacl.2022.28.3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the late twentieth century, with the end of the Cold War and the acceleration of globalization, discussions on “Global Constitutionalism”, an expanded understanding of modern constitutionalism, have emerged. Proponents of Global Constitutionalism argue that the specific principles of modern constitutionalism, such as guaranteeing human rights, separation of powers, the rule of law, democracy, and judicial review in the transnational human rights regime, can have global implications. Various criticisms have been raised against this argument based on the notions of the homogenous nation state, legal positivism, legal pluralism, etc. If, however, it is possible to establish constitutionalism grounded in constitutional pluralism, while responding to temporal and spatial particularities, the discussion on Global Constitutionalism should be valid and useful in explaining the changes in the field of international-transnational law in the twenty-first century. Further theoretical and practical groundwork is needed to realize the contents of Global Constitutionalism, but it is difficult to regard Global Constitutionalism as a completely unrealistic concept.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球宪政初探
20世纪末以来,随着冷战的结束和全球化进程的加快,对现代宪政的一种扩展理解——“全球宪政”的讨论应运而生。全球宪政主义的支持者认为,现代宪政的具体原则,如保障人权、权力分立、法治、民主和跨国人权制度下的司法审查,可以具有全球影响。基于同质民族国家、法律实证主义、法律多元主义等概念,对这一论点提出了各种批评。然而,如果有可能在宪法多元化的基础上建立立宪主义,同时回应时间和空间的特殊性,那么关于全球立宪主义的讨论应该是有效和有用的,可以解释21世纪国际跨国法领域的变化。实现全球宪政的内容需要进一步的理论和实践基础,但很难将全球宪政视为完全不现实的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crisis of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal and its Constitutional Implication Political Party Clause of the Korean Constitution: De Constitutione Ferenda A study on State Surveillance of Telecommunications in Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights Constitutional review of invalidation of election due to election crimes by others Critical Review of Substantive Due Process of Law: Discussion on the Necessity of Substantive Due Process of Law in the Korean Constitution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1