Why Islamic Banks Tend to Avoid Participatory Financing? A Demand, Regulation, and Uncertainty Framework

M. Nouman, K. Ullah, S. Gul
{"title":"Why Islamic Banks Tend to Avoid Participatory Financing? A Demand, Regulation, and Uncertainty Framework","authors":"M. Nouman, K. Ullah, S. Gul","doi":"10.22547/BER/10.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory financing arrangements including Musharakah and Mudarabah are the essence of Islamic banking and represent the true spirit of Islamic banking and finance. Therefore, Islamic banks are expected to allow and promote participatory financing. In practice, Islamic banks adopt participatory financing arrangements for the scheme of deposits. However, they do not adopt participatory financing on the assets side due to several constraints. By far, the non-participatory financing arrangements, particularly Murabahah and Ijarah, are the most dominant modes of financing around the globe. Many authors have provided different explanations for the tendency of Islamic banks to avoid participatory financing. However, literature is divergent and the typology of the constraints to participatory financing is missing. Therefore, there is no unified understanding of the constraints to participatory financing. The present study employs insights form the extant literature using a systematic literature review and synthesizes a coherent participatory financing constraints framework using the thematic synthesis method to name and make sense of what makes participatory financing a less attractive option for Islamic banks. This study adds to the Islamic banking and finance literature by synthesizing the divergent literature, and conceptualizing a participatory financing constraints framework which can be used as a dependable framework for assessment in any related case study and policy implications. Moreover, it demonstrates an application of systematic review in Islamic banking research.","PeriodicalId":101665,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth: Center for Decision Research (Managerial & Organizational Behavior) Working Paper Series","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth: Center for Decision Research (Managerial & Organizational Behavior) Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22547/BER/10.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Participatory financing arrangements including Musharakah and Mudarabah are the essence of Islamic banking and represent the true spirit of Islamic banking and finance. Therefore, Islamic banks are expected to allow and promote participatory financing. In practice, Islamic banks adopt participatory financing arrangements for the scheme of deposits. However, they do not adopt participatory financing on the assets side due to several constraints. By far, the non-participatory financing arrangements, particularly Murabahah and Ijarah, are the most dominant modes of financing around the globe. Many authors have provided different explanations for the tendency of Islamic banks to avoid participatory financing. However, literature is divergent and the typology of the constraints to participatory financing is missing. Therefore, there is no unified understanding of the constraints to participatory financing. The present study employs insights form the extant literature using a systematic literature review and synthesizes a coherent participatory financing constraints framework using the thematic synthesis method to name and make sense of what makes participatory financing a less attractive option for Islamic banks. This study adds to the Islamic banking and finance literature by synthesizing the divergent literature, and conceptualizing a participatory financing constraints framework which can be used as a dependable framework for assessment in any related case study and policy implications. Moreover, it demonstrates an application of systematic review in Islamic banking research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么伊斯兰银行倾向于避免参与融资?需求、监管和不确定性框架
包括Musharakah和Mudarabah在内的参与式融资安排是伊斯兰银行的精髓,代表了伊斯兰银行和金融的真正精神。因此,伊斯兰银行有望允许和促进参与式融资。实际上,伊斯兰银行对存款计划采用参与性融资安排。然而,由于一些制约因素,它们没有在资产端采用参与式融资。到目前为止,非参与性筹资安排,特别是Murabahah和Ijarah,是全球最主要的筹资方式。对于伊斯兰银行回避参与式融资的倾向,许多作者给出了不同的解释。然而,文献存在分歧,参与式融资约束的类型学缺失。因此,对参与式融资的制约因素并没有统一的认识。本研究采用现有文献的见解,通过系统的文献综述,并使用主题综合方法综合了一个连贯的参与式融资约束框架,以命名和理解是什么使参与式融资对伊斯兰银行的吸引力降低。本研究通过综合不同的文献,并概念化参与性融资约束框架,从而增加了伊斯兰银行和金融文献,该框架可作为任何相关案例研究和政策影响评估的可靠框架。此外,本文还展示了系统评价在伊斯兰银行研究中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intellectual Capital, and Knowledge Processes for Organizational Innovativeness across Industries: The Case of Poland – the full version The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Organizational Creativity in the Midst of Work from Home (WFH) System Due to Pandemic COVID-19 Actor-Based Approaches in Business Administration Research Why Islamic Banks Tend to Avoid Participatory Financing? A Demand, Regulation, and Uncertainty Framework Practical Application of Theory in Business
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1