Actor-Based Approaches in Business Administration Research

Peter Kotzian
{"title":"Actor-Based Approaches in Business Administration Research","authors":"Peter Kotzian","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3428432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that the research questions of business administration as an academic discipline has to deal with can be classified into three types: first-order problems concern problems occurring in the daily operations of firms, for instance, how to correctly calculate the net present value of an investment project. Second-order problems concern how institutional settings in the firm must be designed in order to assure that solutions to first-order problems are actually applied by the actors in the firm. For instance, how to design a decision support system in order to avoid costly decision-biases known to occur in managerial decision-making. Third-order problems concern the question, why some firms install such advantageous institutional settings, while others do not. Economics typically assumes that solving first- and second-order problems constitute a competitive advantage for the firm which is able to do so, which implies that competition will force all firms to do so. However, entrepreneurial practice indicates this to be not the case: first, some institutions, for instance for surveillance, are costly to operate and the operating costs of such institutions may well exceed the costs arsing from the problem itself. Second, organizational changes are costly too, both in terms of installing a new organizational setup and in terms of overcoming the resistance of persons with vested interests in the existing institutional setting and general organizational inertia. While first-order problems constitute the traditional domain of business administration research and in particular teaching, the behavioral turn, the inclusion of psychological elements in the research agenda and “explanatory toolbox” of economics and business administration, is accompanied by a shift of the focus on second- and third-order problems. This raises the question, what methodological basis is appropriate for introducing explanations originating from an individual-level focused discipline like psychology to the research agenda of business administration research, which is concerned with collective entities, like firms and markets. This essay is about how actor-based methodological approaches from sociology can contribute to solving second- and third-order problems, using the cases of decision biases and the choice of institutional settings as examples.","PeriodicalId":101665,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth: Center for Decision Research (Managerial & Organizational Behavior) Working Paper Series","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth: Center for Decision Research (Managerial & Organizational Behavior) Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3428432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay argues that the research questions of business administration as an academic discipline has to deal with can be classified into three types: first-order problems concern problems occurring in the daily operations of firms, for instance, how to correctly calculate the net present value of an investment project. Second-order problems concern how institutional settings in the firm must be designed in order to assure that solutions to first-order problems are actually applied by the actors in the firm. For instance, how to design a decision support system in order to avoid costly decision-biases known to occur in managerial decision-making. Third-order problems concern the question, why some firms install such advantageous institutional settings, while others do not. Economics typically assumes that solving first- and second-order problems constitute a competitive advantage for the firm which is able to do so, which implies that competition will force all firms to do so. However, entrepreneurial practice indicates this to be not the case: first, some institutions, for instance for surveillance, are costly to operate and the operating costs of such institutions may well exceed the costs arsing from the problem itself. Second, organizational changes are costly too, both in terms of installing a new organizational setup and in terms of overcoming the resistance of persons with vested interests in the existing institutional setting and general organizational inertia. While first-order problems constitute the traditional domain of business administration research and in particular teaching, the behavioral turn, the inclusion of psychological elements in the research agenda and “explanatory toolbox” of economics and business administration, is accompanied by a shift of the focus on second- and third-order problems. This raises the question, what methodological basis is appropriate for introducing explanations originating from an individual-level focused discipline like psychology to the research agenda of business administration research, which is concerned with collective entities, like firms and markets. This essay is about how actor-based methodological approaches from sociology can contribute to solving second- and third-order problems, using the cases of decision biases and the choice of institutional settings as examples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业管理研究中基于行动者的方法
本文认为,企业管理作为一门学科所要研究的问题可分为三类:一阶问题涉及企业日常经营中的问题,如如何正确计算投资项目的净现值;二阶问题涉及企业中的制度设置必须如何设计,以确保企业中的行为者实际应用第一阶问题的解决方案。例如,如何设计一个决策支持系统,以避免在管理决策中发生昂贵的决策偏差。第三阶问题涉及的问题是,为什么一些公司设置了如此有利的制度设置,而另一些公司没有。经济学通常假设,解决一阶和二阶问题对有能力这样做的企业构成竞争优势,这意味着竞争将迫使所有企业这样做。然而,企业实践表明情况并非如此:首先,一些机构,例如监督机构,运作成本很高,而且这些机构的运作成本可能远远超过问题本身所产生的成本。第二,组织变革的代价也很高,既要建立一个新的组织机构,也要克服现有机构设置中既得利益者的阻力和普遍的组织惰性。虽然一阶问题构成了工商管理研究特别是教学的传统领域,但行为转向,即在经济学和工商管理的研究议程和“解释工具箱”中纳入心理因素,伴随着对二阶和三阶问题的关注转移。这就提出了一个问题,什么方法学基础适合将源自心理学等个人层面的集中学科的解释引入与企业和市场等集体实体有关的企业管理研究议程。本文以决策偏差和制度设置的选择为例,探讨了社会学中基于行为者的方法论方法如何有助于解决二级和三级问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intellectual Capital, and Knowledge Processes for Organizational Innovativeness across Industries: The Case of Poland – the full version The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Organizational Creativity in the Midst of Work from Home (WFH) System Due to Pandemic COVID-19 Actor-Based Approaches in Business Administration Research Why Islamic Banks Tend to Avoid Participatory Financing? A Demand, Regulation, and Uncertainty Framework Practical Application of Theory in Business
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1