Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India (review)

A. Skaria
{"title":"Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India (review)","authors":"A. Skaria","doi":"10.5860/choice.37-4046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Another Reason is an exploration of science’s history as a sign of Indian modernity, of “science’s cultural authority as the legitimating sign of rationality and progress” (7). Gyan Prakash seeks to understand the work of science through the analytic of translation rather than, as is conventional, an emphasis on imposition, adaptation, or dialectic. In the process, he provides a thought-provoking and far-reaching analysis of Indian and colonial modernity. As Prakash suggests, the question of science and scientific reason is a charged one in colonial situations. The new language of rule and knowledge that emerged in early-nineteenth-century colonial India—as theBritish produced encyclopedic histories, surveys, studies, and censuses— effectively constituted India through the empirical sciences. Another Reason focuses in particular on two intimately linked and yet very different ways of translating universal scientific reason onto the Indian stage: those of the British and those of the colonized elite. For the British, the empirical sciences were a universal knowledge charged with the mission of dissolving and secularizing the religious worldviews of the native; in other words, they were supposed to rationalize native societies. In colonial practices, then, scientific reason was a despotism practiced in order to liberate the colonized. In an important departure from recent postcolonial scholarship, which has looked at museums and exhibitions as forms of colonial domination, Prakash points out that this dominant discourse of science led a “distorted life” (19). Colonial pedagogy sought to instruct natives “by exhibiting their own products and knowledge organized and authorized by the science of classification” (23).","PeriodicalId":343953,"journal":{"name":"Nepantla: Views from South","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepantla: Views from South","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-4046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Another Reason is an exploration of science’s history as a sign of Indian modernity, of “science’s cultural authority as the legitimating sign of rationality and progress” (7). Gyan Prakash seeks to understand the work of science through the analytic of translation rather than, as is conventional, an emphasis on imposition, adaptation, or dialectic. In the process, he provides a thought-provoking and far-reaching analysis of Indian and colonial modernity. As Prakash suggests, the question of science and scientific reason is a charged one in colonial situations. The new language of rule and knowledge that emerged in early-nineteenth-century colonial India—as theBritish produced encyclopedic histories, surveys, studies, and censuses— effectively constituted India through the empirical sciences. Another Reason focuses in particular on two intimately linked and yet very different ways of translating universal scientific reason onto the Indian stage: those of the British and those of the colonized elite. For the British, the empirical sciences were a universal knowledge charged with the mission of dissolving and secularizing the religious worldviews of the native; in other words, they were supposed to rationalize native societies. In colonial practices, then, scientific reason was a despotism practiced in order to liberate the colonized. In an important departure from recent postcolonial scholarship, which has looked at museums and exhibitions as forms of colonial domination, Prakash points out that this dominant discourse of science led a “distorted life” (19). Colonial pedagogy sought to instruct natives “by exhibiting their own products and knowledge organized and authorized by the science of classification” (23).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
另一个原因:现代印度的科学与想象(评论)
另一个原因是对作为印度现代性标志的科学史的探索,“科学的文化权威作为理性和进步的合法标志”(7)。吉安·普拉卡什(Gyan Prakash)试图通过翻译的分析来理解科学工作,而不是像传统那样强调强加、适应或辩证法。在这个过程中,他对印度和殖民时代的现代性进行了发人深省、影响深远的分析。正如普拉卡什所言,科学和科学理性的问题在殖民时期是一个充满争议的问题。在19世纪早期的殖民地印度出现的新的统治语言和知识——英国人制作了百科全书式的历史、调查、研究和人口普查——通过实证科学有效地构建了印度。《另一个原因》特别关注两种密切相关但又截然不同的方式,将普遍的科学理性翻译到印度的舞台上:英国的和殖民地精英的。对英国人来说,经验科学是一种普遍的知识,肩负着消解和世俗化本土宗教世界观的使命;换句话说,他们应该使土著社会合理化。因此,在殖民实践中,科学理性是一种为了解放被殖民者而实行的专制。普拉卡什(Prakash)指出,这种占主导地位的科学话语导致了一种“扭曲的生活”,这与最近的后殖民学术(将博物馆和展览视为殖民统治的形式)有很大的不同。殖民地教育学试图通过“展示他们自己的产品和知识,并由分类科学组织和授权”来指导当地人(23)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empires of Nature The Art of Transition: Latin American Culture and Neoliberal Crisis (review) Lost in the Translation Lead Us Not into Translation: Notes toward a Theoretical Foundation for Asian Studies Orientalism, Anti-Orientalism, Relativism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1