KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN REKAM MEDIS KONVESIONAL DAN ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA

Chris Anggi Natalia Berutu, Yanti Agustina, Sonya Airini Batubara
{"title":"KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN REKAM MEDIS KONVESIONAL DAN ELEKTRONIK BERDASARKAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA","authors":"Chris Anggi Natalia Berutu, Yanti Agustina, Sonya Airini Batubara","doi":"10.33059/jhsk.v15i2.2686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical records are files containing patient records, which are made chronological time. There are two types of medical records and in general have been regulated in Permenkes Number 269 / MENKES / PER / III / 2008 concerning Medical Records, namely conventional medical records and electronic medical records. One of the benefits of medical records is as evidence in the law enforcement process. This type of research is normative juridical research and is analytical descriptive in nature. The data source used in this research is secondary data, which is obtained from books, journals, expert opinions and others. The data collection technique used is to collect data in this study through documentation studies in the form of data collection from literature or scientific writing in accordance with the object under study. Data analysis is data obtained and then analyzed qualitatively. From the study it is concluded that the difference in the strength of evidence lies in the non-fulfillment of the requirements of electronic medical records as written / letter evidence, in accordance with the Criminal Code Book 4, Concerning Evidence and Expiration, Second Chapter on Evidence by Writing and KUHAP Article 184 paragraph (1) letter c and d, as well as Articles 187 and 188 paragraph (2) letter b. This means that conventional medical records can be used as original written evidence, whereas electronic medical records cannot. The cause of the difference is because both the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code, the power of written evidence, is only in writing, in the form of original letters and / or authentic deeds. The data used are (1) primary data in the form of statutory regulations, results of interviews with hospitals and courts, (2) secondary data through literature studies of various laws and regulations and books / journals to obtain expert opinion. The results of this research are expected to be published through (1) scientific articles in Accredited National Journals and (2) teaching materials in Law courses at the Faculty of Law at Prima Indonesia University.","PeriodicalId":448059,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v15i2.2686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical records are files containing patient records, which are made chronological time. There are two types of medical records and in general have been regulated in Permenkes Number 269 / MENKES / PER / III / 2008 concerning Medical Records, namely conventional medical records and electronic medical records. One of the benefits of medical records is as evidence in the law enforcement process. This type of research is normative juridical research and is analytical descriptive in nature. The data source used in this research is secondary data, which is obtained from books, journals, expert opinions and others. The data collection technique used is to collect data in this study through documentation studies in the form of data collection from literature or scientific writing in accordance with the object under study. Data analysis is data obtained and then analyzed qualitatively. From the study it is concluded that the difference in the strength of evidence lies in the non-fulfillment of the requirements of electronic medical records as written / letter evidence, in accordance with the Criminal Code Book 4, Concerning Evidence and Expiration, Second Chapter on Evidence by Writing and KUHAP Article 184 paragraph (1) letter c and d, as well as Articles 187 and 188 paragraph (2) letter b. This means that conventional medical records can be used as original written evidence, whereas electronic medical records cannot. The cause of the difference is because both the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code, the power of written evidence, is only in writing, in the form of original letters and / or authentic deeds. The data used are (1) primary data in the form of statutory regulations, results of interviews with hospitals and courts, (2) secondary data through literature studies of various laws and regulations and books / journals to obtain expert opinion. The results of this research are expected to be published through (1) scientific articles in Accredited National Journals and (2) teaching materials in Law courses at the Faculty of Law at Prima Indonesia University.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于印尼积极法律的可调节医疗和电子证明法律的力量
医疗记录是包含患者记录的文件,这些记录按时间顺序制作。医疗记录有两种类型,总体上在Permenkes第269 / MENKES / PER / III / 2008号关于医疗记录的文件中有规定,即传统医疗记录和电子医疗记录。医疗记录的好处之一是在执法过程中作为证据。这种类型的研究是规范性的法律研究,本质上是分析描述性的。本研究使用的数据来源为二手数据,主要来源于书籍、期刊、专家意见等。本研究采用的数据收集技术是根据研究对象,采用文献资料或科学写作资料收集的形式,通过文献研究法收集本研究的数据。数据分析是对获得的数据进行定性分析。从研究中得出的结论是,证据强度的差异在于,根据《刑法》第4卷《关于证据和失效》第二章《书面证据》和《国民健康法》第184条第(1)款第c和d项,电子病历没有满足作为书面/书面证据的要求。以及第187条和第188条第(2)款b项。这意味着传统医疗记录可以用作原始书面证据,而电子医疗记录则不能。造成这种差异的原因是,无论是《刑法》还是《刑事诉讼法》,书面证据的权力都只是书面的,以原始信件和/或真实契约的形式。所使用的数据是:(1)以法定法规、医院和法院访谈结果为形式的第一手数据,(2)通过文献研究各种法律法规和书籍/期刊获得专家意见的二手数据。这项研究的结果预计将通过(1)在认可的国家期刊上发表科学文章和(2)在印尼普里玛大学法律系的法律课程教材中发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK NORMATIF PEKERJAPASCA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PERLINDUNGAN HAK PEREMPUAN BERDASARKAN CONVENTION ON ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINTS WOMEN (CEDAW) DALAM TRADISI KAWIN TANGKAP DI SUMBA OBJEK SYIRKAH MENJADI JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN PADA PEMBIAYAAN PERUMAHAN MELALUI AKAD MUSYARAKAH MUTANAQISHAH TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKSANAAN REKLAMASI DAN PASCA TAMBANG PERUSAHAAN PEMEGANG IUP OPERASI PRODUKSI BATUBARA BERDASARKAN PRINSIP GOOD MINING PRACTICE ANALISIS PEMBERIAN SUAKA OLEH HONGARIA PADA HUNGARIAN ASYLUM POLICY 2015 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PRINSIP NON-PENALIZATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1