Prevalência de fatores associados à infertilidade em mulheres inférteis submetidas à laparoscopia diagnóstica

Daniela Angerame Yela, Raquel Togni, Cristina Laguna Benetti‐Pinto
{"title":"Prevalência de fatores associados à infertilidade em mulheres inférteis submetidas à laparoscopia diagnóstica","authors":"Daniela Angerame Yela,&nbsp;Raquel Togni,&nbsp;Cristina Laguna Benetti‐Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.recli.2016.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the role of laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility at the University of Campinas in the last five years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective descriptive study with all diagnostic laparoscopy in the last five years made in endoscopic gynecology clinic of the tertiary hospital. 353 medical records of women with infertility undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy between the years 2008 to 2012 were analyzed the clinical characteristics of these women and the indications of laparoscopy and intraoperative findings were evaluated. Descriptive analysis (frequency, mean and standard deviation) was performed for categorical variables. To evaluate the association between the variables, we used the Kruskal Wallis test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The women were on average 32<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.4 years. Laparoscopy found 52.98% of tubal alterations, 17.84% of endometriosis and 11.33% of adhesions. Almost 18% of tests did not show any change. The hysterosalpingography had a sensitivity of 84.61% and specificity of 32.58% compared to laparoscopy. Infertile women have a higher risk for tubal changes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Tubal alterations are still the leading cause of infertility. Laparoscopy appears as a better technique hysterosalpingography for detecting tubal alterations, in addition to be able to detect changes in other organs that can cause infertility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101073,"journal":{"name":"Reprodu??o & Climatério","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 159-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.recli.2016.08.004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reprodu??o & Climatério","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413208716300401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the role of laparoscopy in the investigation of infertility at the University of Campinas in the last five years.

Methods

Retrospective descriptive study with all diagnostic laparoscopy in the last five years made in endoscopic gynecology clinic of the tertiary hospital. 353 medical records of women with infertility undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy between the years 2008 to 2012 were analyzed the clinical characteristics of these women and the indications of laparoscopy and intraoperative findings were evaluated. Descriptive analysis (frequency, mean and standard deviation) was performed for categorical variables. To evaluate the association between the variables, we used the Kruskal Wallis test.

Results

The women were on average 32 ± 4.4 years. Laparoscopy found 52.98% of tubal alterations, 17.84% of endometriosis and 11.33% of adhesions. Almost 18% of tests did not show any change. The hysterosalpingography had a sensitivity of 84.61% and specificity of 32.58% compared to laparoscopy. Infertile women have a higher risk for tubal changes.

Conclusion

Tubal alterations are still the leading cause of infertility. Laparoscopy appears as a better technique hysterosalpingography for detecting tubal alterations, in addition to be able to detect changes in other organs that can cause infertility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受诊断性腹腔镜检查的不孕妇女不孕相关因素的患病率
目的评价近五年来腹腔镜在坎皮纳斯大学不孕症调查中的作用。方法对该三级医院妇科内窥镜门诊近5年的所有诊断性腹腔镜患者进行回顾性描述性研究。分析2008 ~ 2012年353例不孕症患者行诊断性腹腔镜手术的临床特点,并对腹腔镜手术指征和术中表现进行评价。对分类变量进行描述性分析(频率、平均值和标准差)。为了评估变量之间的关联,我们使用了Kruskal Wallis检验。结果患者平均年龄32±4.4岁。腹腔镜检查发现输卵管改变占52.98%,子宫内膜异位症占17.84%,粘连占11.33%。几乎18%的测试没有显示出任何变化。与腹腔镜相比,子宫输卵管造影的敏感性为84.61%,特异性为32.58%。不孕妇女患输卵管病变的风险更高。结论输卵管改变仍是导致不孕的主要原因。腹腔镜似乎是一种更好的技术子宫输卵管造影检测输卵管改变,除了能够检测其他器官的变化,可能导致不孕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alteração menstrual e qualidade de vida em professoras da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Brasil Outcomes of GnRH agonist triggering in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review Perfil diferencial de transcritos em endométrio eutópico de mulheres inférteis com endometriose e controles durante a janela de implantação Dieta isenta de glúten e risco de desfechos gestacionais desfavoráveis em mulheres com doença celíaca: revisão sistemática Male infertility profile in an assisted human reproduction clinic from the south of Santa Catarina, Brazil, from 2012 to 2014
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1