GROUP IDEATION WITH BRAINWRITING – A COMPARISON OF CO-LOCATED AND DISTANCE COLLABORATION

M. Voss, Hulusi Bozkurt, T. Sauer, Marc Nutzmann
{"title":"GROUP IDEATION WITH BRAINWRITING – A COMPARISON OF CO-LOCATED AND DISTANCE COLLABORATION","authors":"M. Voss, Hulusi Bozkurt, T. Sauer, Marc Nutzmann","doi":"10.35199/epde.2022.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the influence of physical proximity (co-location vs. distance) and the medium (paper vs. online) on idea generation. It especially focusses on a popular brainwriting technique – namely Method 6-3-5. For this, an experiment with altogether 𝑁 = 134 Engineering Design students was conducted. The results show that the mode of interaction generally does not bias the quantity of ideas generated, but that the rate of graphical representations drops slightly.","PeriodicalId":147286,"journal":{"name":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DS 117: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2022), London South Bank University in London, UK. 8th - 9th September 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2022.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the influence of physical proximity (co-location vs. distance) and the medium (paper vs. online) on idea generation. It especially focusses on a popular brainwriting technique – namely Method 6-3-5. For this, an experiment with altogether 𝑁 = 134 Engineering Design students was conducted. The results show that the mode of interaction generally does not bias the quantity of ideas generated, but that the rate of graphical representations drops slightly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集体构思与脑力写作——同地协作与远程协作的比较
本文考察了物理距离(同处一地vs.距离)和媒介(纸媒vs.网络)对创意产生的影响。它特别关注一种流行的大脑写作技巧——即6-3-5方法。为此,我们对总共134名工程设计专业的学生进行了实验。结果表明,交互模式通常不会影响产生的想法数量,但图形表示的比率略有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HOW GRAPHIC DESIGN CAN INFLUENCE THE PERCEPTION OF SUSTAINABLE FOOD PACKAGING EXPERIENCES WITH EMOTIONAL DESIGN ECOLOGICAL ETHICS: TOWARDS AN EDUCATION OF TECHNO-DIVERSITY ANTICIPATIVE CO-CREATION METHOD EVALUATION OF WORKBOOKS AS AN ACTIVE LEARNING TOOL FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1