The relationship between obsessive compulsive disorder and mental contamination (MC): psychometric properties of Vancouver Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-MC Scale and Thought-Action Fusion-Contamination Scale -

Mujgan Inozu, Ilgun Bilekli, Fulya Ozcanli Ulukut
{"title":"The relationship between obsessive compulsive disorder and mental contamination (MC): psychometric properties of Vancouver Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-MC Scale and Thought-Action Fusion-Contamination Scale -","authors":"Mujgan Inozu, Ilgun Bilekli, Fulya Ozcanli Ulukut","doi":"10.5350/DAJPN2016290405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Mental contamination is defined as feelings of internal dirtiness in absence of actual contact with a dirty physical object or a person. Mental contamination is considered to play an important role in maintenance and persistence of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This study aimed to examine psychometric properties of the Turkish version of two objective measures of mental contamination: Vancouver Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Mental Contamination Scale (VOCI-MC) and Thought-Action Fusion-Contamination Scale (TAF-CS). \nMethod: The participants were 255 university students (183 females and 70 males) with the age range of 18-28 years. The participants were asked to fill out the questionnaire set consisted of VOCI-MC, TAF-CS, Thought-Action Fusion Scale (TAFS), Disgust Scale-Revised, Trait Anger Expression Inventory and Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R). \nResults: Reliability analyses indicated that internal consistency of VOCI-MC and TAF-CS were 0.93 and 0.92, and test-retest reliabilities were 0.79 and 0.61, respectively. Consistent with the original study, the results of explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that both scales had one factor structure. Convergent and divergent validity analyses revealed that both scales were positively correlated with OCI-R total scores and its subscales as well as TAF total score and its subscales; but this relationship was significantly less strong for Trait Anger and Disgust Sensitivity. While VOCI-MC significantly predicted OCD symptomatology, TAF-CS had no predictive power in this regard. \nConclusions: The results support that psychometric properties of the Turkish versions of the scales meet acceptable standards for validity and reliability, and therefore can be used among Turkish population.","PeriodicalId":136580,"journal":{"name":"Düşünen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Düşünen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2016290405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Mental contamination is defined as feelings of internal dirtiness in absence of actual contact with a dirty physical object or a person. Mental contamination is considered to play an important role in maintenance and persistence of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This study aimed to examine psychometric properties of the Turkish version of two objective measures of mental contamination: Vancouver Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Mental Contamination Scale (VOCI-MC) and Thought-Action Fusion-Contamination Scale (TAF-CS). Method: The participants were 255 university students (183 females and 70 males) with the age range of 18-28 years. The participants were asked to fill out the questionnaire set consisted of VOCI-MC, TAF-CS, Thought-Action Fusion Scale (TAFS), Disgust Scale-Revised, Trait Anger Expression Inventory and Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R). Results: Reliability analyses indicated that internal consistency of VOCI-MC and TAF-CS were 0.93 and 0.92, and test-retest reliabilities were 0.79 and 0.61, respectively. Consistent with the original study, the results of explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis indicated that both scales had one factor structure. Convergent and divergent validity analyses revealed that both scales were positively correlated with OCI-R total scores and its subscales as well as TAF total score and its subscales; but this relationship was significantly less strong for Trait Anger and Disgust Sensitivity. While VOCI-MC significantly predicted OCD symptomatology, TAF-CS had no predictive power in this regard. Conclusions: The results support that psychometric properties of the Turkish versions of the scales meet acceptable standards for validity and reliability, and therefore can be used among Turkish population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强迫障碍与精神污染的关系:温哥华强迫量表和思想-行动融合-污染量表的心理测量特征
目的:精神污染被定义为在没有实际接触肮脏的物理物体或人的情况下感到内心肮脏。精神污染被认为在强迫症的维持和持续中起着重要作用。本研究旨在检验土耳其版的两种客观心理污染测量方法:温哥华强迫症量表-心理污染量表(VOCI-MC)和思想-行动融合污染量表(TAF-CS)的心理测量特性。方法:调查对象为255名大学生,其中女183名,男70名,年龄18 ~ 28岁。被试填写由VOCI-MC、TAF-CS、思想-行动融合量表(TAFS)、厌恶量表(修订)、特质愤怒表达量表和强迫症量表(OCI-R)组成的问卷。结果:信度分析表明,VOCI-MC和TAF-CS的内部一致性分别为0.93和0.92,重测信度分别为0.79和0.61。解释性因子分析和验证性因子分析的结果与原研究一致,表明两个量表都具有一个因子结构。收敛效度分析和发散效度分析显示,两种量表均与OCI-R总分及其子量表、TAF总分及其子量表呈正相关;但对于特质性愤怒和厌恶敏感性而言,这种关系明显不那么强。虽然VOCI-MC能显著预测强迫症症状,但TAF-CS在这方面没有预测能力。结论:结果支持土耳其版本量表的心理测量特性在效度和信度上符合可接受的标准,因此可以在土耳其人群中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of emotional interference on learning in an emotional probabilistic Go/No-Go task Mirtazapine-related manic / hypomanic shift: mini review and case report Psychosurgery and other invasive approaches in treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: a brief overview through a case Relationship between depression and anxiety symptoms in studies conducted in Turkey: a meta-analysis study Comorbidity of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1