Maximal Oxygen Intake, Endurance Running Performance, and Body Composition in College Women

F. Katch, W. D. McArdle, G. Pechar, R. Czula
{"title":"Maximal Oxygen Intake, Endurance Running Performance, and Body Composition in College Women","authors":"F. Katch, W. D. McArdle, G. Pechar, R. Czula","doi":"10.1080/10671188.1973.10615208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of the present study was to determine the validity of Cooper's 12-min. endurance run test in 36 college women using max VO2 as the criterion of validity. Max VO2 was measured using the Balke treadmill test (mean = 2.29 L/min; 38.9 ml/kg/min). Percent body fat (mean = 21.8%) and lean body weight (mean = 45.0 kg.) were also determined in 17 women from body density measurements (underwater weighing). A significant correlation of r = .67 was obtained between the endurance run and max VO2 (ml/kg/min), which increased to r = .71 when the correlation was corrected for attenuation from test unreliability in max VO2 (r 11 = .95) and the run (r 22 = .78). One standard error for predicting max VO2 from the run scores was within ± 9% (3.4 ml/kg) and ± 13% (299 ml/min) of predicted values, respectively. Cooper's regression equation to predict max VO2 from the run scores in men underestimated the average max VO2 in women by 18%. Lean body weight correlated r = .49 with the run scores and r = .76 wi...","PeriodicalId":192960,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1973-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1973.10615208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of the present study was to determine the validity of Cooper's 12-min. endurance run test in 36 college women using max VO2 as the criterion of validity. Max VO2 was measured using the Balke treadmill test (mean = 2.29 L/min; 38.9 ml/kg/min). Percent body fat (mean = 21.8%) and lean body weight (mean = 45.0 kg.) were also determined in 17 women from body density measurements (underwater weighing). A significant correlation of r = .67 was obtained between the endurance run and max VO2 (ml/kg/min), which increased to r = .71 when the correlation was corrected for attenuation from test unreliability in max VO2 (r 11 = .95) and the run (r 22 = .78). One standard error for predicting max VO2 from the run scores was within ± 9% (3.4 ml/kg) and ± 13% (299 ml/min) of predicted values, respectively. Cooper's regression equation to predict max VO2 from the run scores in men underestimated the average max VO2 in women by 18%. Lean body weight correlated r = .49 with the run scores and r = .76 wi...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学女生最大摄氧量,耐力跑表现和身体成分
摘要本研究的目的是确定库珀的12分钟的效度。以最大摄氧量为效度标准对36名女大学生进行耐力跑试验。采用Balke跑步机试验测定最大摄氧量(mean = 2.29 L/min;38.9毫升/公斤/分钟)。还通过体密度测量(水下称重)确定了17名妇女的体脂百分比(平均21.8%)和瘦体重(平均45.0 kg)。耐力跑与最大摄氧量(ml/kg/min)之间的相关性为r = 0.67,当对最大摄氧量(r 11 = 0.95)和跑步(r 22 = 0.78)的试验不可靠性衰减进行校正后,相关性增加到r = 0.71。从跑步评分预测最大摄氧量的标准误差分别在预测值的±9% (3.4 ml/kg)和±13% (299 ml/min)范围内。库珀根据男性跑步成绩预测最大摄氧量的回归方程低估了女性的平均最大摄氧量18%。瘦体重与跑步成绩相关r = 0.49,与跑步成绩相关r = 0.76。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exercise-Induced Activation and Human Performance: A Review A Somatotype Dispersion Index Prediction of Endurance Performance and Oxygen Consumption from Cardiac Time Components An Improved Stabilometer Task Apparatus Family Influence and Involvement in Sports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1