{"title":"Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test—Form A and B Revised","authors":"J. E. Hewitt","doi":"10.1080/10671188.1964.10613293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test, first reported in the Research Quarterly in 1937, has been revised. During the interim over 10,000 copies of Form A and B have been used by members of the profession. There were 200 questions in the original battery. These were reduced to 100 after each of the questions was evaluated by item analysis and Holzinger's Index of Discrimination. The difficulty rating was determined from the percentage answered correctly by three levels of tennis ability—beginners, advanced, and the varsity group. Alternate halves (odd vs. even) for the two forms A and B, when using the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula, gave a reliability of .95. When correlated with the Minnesota Tennis Knowledge test, r = .81, and with Scott's Achievement Examinations for Elementary and Intermediate Tennis, r = .86; this would indicate sufficient validity. Scoring key and grading scale for each form is included at the end of the paper.","PeriodicalId":192960,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1964-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1964.10613293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Hewitt's Comprehensive Tennis Knowledge Test, first reported in the Research Quarterly in 1937, has been revised. During the interim over 10,000 copies of Form A and B have been used by members of the profession. There were 200 questions in the original battery. These were reduced to 100 after each of the questions was evaluated by item analysis and Holzinger's Index of Discrimination. The difficulty rating was determined from the percentage answered correctly by three levels of tennis ability—beginners, advanced, and the varsity group. Alternate halves (odd vs. even) for the two forms A and B, when using the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula, gave a reliability of .95. When correlated with the Minnesota Tennis Knowledge test, r = .81, and with Scott's Achievement Examinations for Elementary and Intermediate Tennis, r = .86; this would indicate sufficient validity. Scoring key and grading scale for each form is included at the end of the paper.
休伊特网球综合知识测验首次发表于1937年的《研究季刊》,现已进行了修订。在此期间,专业人员使用了超过10,000份表格A和表格B。原始电池中有200个问题。通过项目分析和Holzinger's Index of Discrimination对每个问题进行评估后,这些问题减少到100个。难度等级是根据三个水平的网球选手——初学者、高级选手和校队——正确回答的百分比确定的。当使用斯皮尔曼-布朗预言公式时,A和B两种形式的交替一半(奇数或偶数)的可靠性为0.95。当与明尼苏达网球知识测验相关时,r = .81,与斯科特初级和中级网球成绩测验相关时,r = .86;这将表明足够的有效性。每个表格的评分关键和评分尺度都包含在论文的最后。