A Machine Learning-Based Approach to Analyze Public Sentiment on Indian New Education Policy 2020

Gaurav Meena, K. Mohbey, Mehul Mahrishi
{"title":"A Machine Learning-Based Approach to Analyze Public Sentiment on Indian New Education Policy 2020","authors":"Gaurav Meena, K. Mohbey, Mehul Mahrishi","doi":"10.1109/IEEECONF56852.2023.10105097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sentiment analysis is a circular process that helps to understand the evaluation of a text. People are interested in sharing what they know about an event and reading what others say about it in reviews posted to online media outlets. Sentiment analysis (SA) can be used for this sorting purpose. From all the reviews provided by different people, SA pulls out the structured-less text reviews relating to an item survey, an event, and so on and then classifies them as either positive, negative, or neutral. Polarity categorization is another term for this. This research examines and contrasts several machine-learning approaches to SA on the Twitter dataset. Using the NEP2020 Twitter dataset, the results are compared. Results are evaluated using several criteria: accuracy, precision, and recall. Results show that logistic regression outperforms competing machine learning methods.","PeriodicalId":445092,"journal":{"name":"2023 Future of Educational Innovation-Workshop Series Data in Action","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Future of Educational Innovation-Workshop Series Data in Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEECONF56852.2023.10105097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is a circular process that helps to understand the evaluation of a text. People are interested in sharing what they know about an event and reading what others say about it in reviews posted to online media outlets. Sentiment analysis (SA) can be used for this sorting purpose. From all the reviews provided by different people, SA pulls out the structured-less text reviews relating to an item survey, an event, and so on and then classifies them as either positive, negative, or neutral. Polarity categorization is another term for this. This research examines and contrasts several machine-learning approaches to SA on the Twitter dataset. Using the NEP2020 Twitter dataset, the results are compared. Results are evaluated using several criteria: accuracy, precision, and recall. Results show that logistic regression outperforms competing machine learning methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的印度2020年新教育政策公众情绪分析方法
情感分析是一个循环过程,有助于理解对文本的评价。人们喜欢分享他们对某件事的了解,也喜欢阅读别人在网络媒体上发表的评论。情感分析(SA)可用于此排序目的。从不同人提供的所有评论中,SA提取出与项目调查、事件等相关的无结构文本评论,然后将它们分类为积极、消极或中立。极性分类是另一个术语。本研究检查并对比了几种机器学习方法在Twitter数据集上的SA。使用NEP2020 Twitter数据集对结果进行比较。使用几个标准评估结果:准确性、精密度和召回率。结果表明,逻辑回归优于竞争的机器学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging Perspectives on Sustainability in Business Schools: A Systematic Literature Review of Pedagogical Tools in Teaching Sustainability Applications of Natural Language Processing for Industry 4.0 Skills Development Tailor-Made Nutrition Education for University Students through Data Science Instructional Usability and Learner-User eXperience Assessment in a Virtual Reality Educational Milieu: A Deductive Tech-Instructionality Model from EdTech Experimental Survey’s results for IoT Projects with Tinkercad Circuits Prototypes for Virtual Classes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1