Bronchiale Thermoplastie bei Asthmapatienten mit schwerer Obstruktion: Benefit und Komplikationsrisiko

L. Hagmeyer
{"title":"Bronchiale Thermoplastie bei Asthmapatienten mit schwerer Obstruktion: Benefit und Komplikationsrisiko","authors":"L. Hagmeyer","doi":"10.1159/000504589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Randomized clinical trials of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) were conducted in patients with a baseline FEV1 greater than 50%. There is a paucity of data regarding BT in patients with more severe obstruction, and consequently these patients are often excluded from receiving BT. The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes in a large cohort of patients with an FEV1 less than 50% with those of a cohort of less obstructed patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with severe asthma were drawn from the Australian BT Registry. Patients were grouped into (1) those with a baseline prebronchodilator FEV1 % predicted <50% (n = 32) or (2) those with an FEV1 ≥50% (n = 36). Adverse outcomes were defined as (1) remaining in hospital longer than the planned 24-hour admission posttreatment or (2) being readmitted to hospital for any cause within 30 days of a treatment. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated 6 months after BT. Results: More severely obstructed patients were no more likely to have experienced any adverse event. Significant improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire score, exacerbation frequency, reliever medication use, and requirement for daily oral steroids were observed in both groups, and were of a similar degree. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that BT can confidently be offered to patients with asthma with an FEV1 that is 30% to 50% of predicted without risk of more frequent or more severe adverse events, and with the expectation of the same degree of response as patients with better lung function.","PeriodicalId":306175,"journal":{"name":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karger Kompass Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000504589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Randomized clinical trials of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) were conducted in patients with a baseline FEV1 greater than 50%. There is a paucity of data regarding BT in patients with more severe obstruction, and consequently these patients are often excluded from receiving BT. The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes in a large cohort of patients with an FEV1 less than 50% with those of a cohort of less obstructed patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with severe asthma were drawn from the Australian BT Registry. Patients were grouped into (1) those with a baseline prebronchodilator FEV1 % predicted <50% (n = 32) or (2) those with an FEV1 ≥50% (n = 36). Adverse outcomes were defined as (1) remaining in hospital longer than the planned 24-hour admission posttreatment or (2) being readmitted to hospital for any cause within 30 days of a treatment. Efficacy outcomes were evaluated 6 months after BT. Results: More severely obstructed patients were no more likely to have experienced any adverse event. Significant improvements in Asthma Control Questionnaire score, exacerbation frequency, reliever medication use, and requirement for daily oral steroids were observed in both groups, and were of a similar degree. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that BT can confidently be offered to patients with asthma with an FEV1 that is 30% to 50% of predicted without risk of more frequent or more severe adverse events, and with the expectation of the same degree of response as patients with better lung function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气管性哮喘严重障碍患者体内体腔热征:这会导致症状症状,并有引起并发症的危险
背景:对基线FEV1大于50%的患者进行了支气管热成形术(BT)的随机临床试验。由于缺乏对梗阻较严重的患者进行BT治疗的数据,因此这些患者通常被排除在BT治疗之外。本研究的目的是比较FEV1小于50%的大队列患者和梗阻较轻的患者的安全性和有效性结果。方法:从澳大利亚BT登记处抽取连续的严重哮喘患者。患者分为:(1)基线支气管扩张剂前FEV1预测值<50% (n = 32)或(2)FEV1≥50% (n = 36)。不良后果定义为(1)治疗后住院时间超过计划住院时间24小时,或(2)在治疗后30天内因任何原因再次住院。在BT后6个月评估疗效结果。结果:梗阻更严重的患者不太可能经历任何不良事件。两组患者在哮喘控制问卷评分、发作频率、缓解药物使用和每日口服类固醇需求方面均有显著改善,且改善程度相似。结论:本研究表明,对于FEV1为预测值的30% - 50%的哮喘患者,可以放心地给予BT治疗,且无更频繁或更严重不良事件的风险,并期望与肺功能较好的患者获得相同程度的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Zentrale Schlafapnoe bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz: Physiologische Auswirkungen der periodischen Beatmung Kaleidoskop Malignes Mesotheliom: Die diagnostische Aussagekraft einer Computertomographie kritisch hinterfragen Pneumocampus PharmaNews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1