Effect of Normal or Blended Funny Discussion on Development of Meta-reading Skills and The Ability to Choose Teaching Method

Yahya Mohmmad Abu Jahjouh
{"title":"Effect of Normal or Blended Funny Discussion on Development of Meta-reading Skills and The Ability to Choose Teaching Method","authors":"Yahya Mohmmad Abu Jahjouh","doi":"10.23960/jpp.v10.i3.202007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effect of Normal or Blended Funny Discussion on Development of Meta-reading Skills and The Ability to Choose Teaching Method. Objectives: The present research aimed to investigate the effect of using the funny discussion strategy (conventional as compared to the blended discussion strategy) on the development of meta-reading skills and the ability to choose the appropriate teaching method among science teaching students in the faculty of education at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza. Method: The researcher followed the experimental method and designed a questionnaire of meta-reading skills and a test of choosing the appropriate teaching method. Findings: There were no statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the meta-reading skills of the students of the two experimental groups. However, the students of the two experimental groups outperformed the students of the control group in the ability to choose the teaching method. Conclusions: funny discussion strategy can be employed independently or in combination with modern technology, and the strategy of funny discussion is suitable for teaching strategies for the students of the faculty of education.","PeriodicalId":187704,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v10.i3.202007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effect of Normal or Blended Funny Discussion on Development of Meta-reading Skills and The Ability to Choose Teaching Method. Objectives: The present research aimed to investigate the effect of using the funny discussion strategy (conventional as compared to the blended discussion strategy) on the development of meta-reading skills and the ability to choose the appropriate teaching method among science teaching students in the faculty of education at Al-Aqsa University in Gaza. Method: The researcher followed the experimental method and designed a questionnaire of meta-reading skills and a test of choosing the appropriate teaching method. Findings: There were no statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the meta-reading skills of the students of the two experimental groups. However, the students of the two experimental groups outperformed the students of the control group in the ability to choose the teaching method. Conclusions: funny discussion strategy can be employed independently or in combination with modern technology, and the strategy of funny discussion is suitable for teaching strategies for the students of the faculty of education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普通或混合幽默讨论对元阅读技能发展及教学方法选择能力的影响
普通或混合幽默讨论对元阅读技能发展及教学方法选择能力的影响。目的:本研究旨在调查使用有趣的讨论策略(传统的与混合的讨论策略相比)对加沙阿克萨大学教育学院理科教学学生的元阅读技能发展和选择合适教学方法的能力的影响。方法:采用实验方法设计元阅读技能问卷和教学方法选择测试。结果:两实验组学生的元阅读技能平均分差异无统计学意义。然而,两个实验组的学生在教学方法的选择能力上优于对照组的学生。结论:风趣讨论策略可以独立运用,也可以与现代技术相结合,风趣讨论策略适用于教育学院学生的教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Students’ Perceptions in the Use of Web-based Character Assessment from Gender Perspective Explosion Box as Learning Media of Ecosystem Components for Elementary School Student Improving Work Engagement Through Compensatory Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being Effect of Blended Learning on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis A Comparative Analysis of Students’ Attitudes and Interests in Science Subjects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1