Spatial and Seasonal Variability of Metocean Design Criteria in the Southern South China Sea From Covariate Extreme Value Analysis

V. Anokhin, E. Ross, D. Randell, P. Jonathan
{"title":"Spatial and Seasonal Variability of Metocean Design Criteria in the Southern South China Sea From Covariate Extreme Value Analysis","authors":"V. Anokhin, E. Ross, D. Randell, P. Jonathan","doi":"10.1115/OMAE2019-95913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper describes spatial and seasonal variability of metocean design criteria in the southern South China Sea. Non-stationary extreme value analysis was performed using the CEVA approach (Covariate Extreme Value Analysis,[1]) for a 59-year long SEAFINE hindcast of winds and waves, estimating metocean design criteria up to 10,000-year return period. Wind design criteria are mostly driven by large-scale monsoonal events; at higher return periods infrequent cyclonic events have strong influence on the tail of the extreme value distribution but confined to a limited geographical area. The CEVA analysis of waves showed much less dependence on the tropical cyclone events; the spatial metocean design criteria were smoother, mostly influenced by the monsoonal wind strength, fetch and local bathymetry. Return value estimates illustrate the strong seasonality of metocean design criteria, with boreal winter (December-February, Northeasterly monsoon) contributing most to the extremes, while April and May are the mildest months. Estimates for the ratio of 10,000/100-year return values are also presented, both for winds and waves. There is empirical evidence that the range of “typical” values of generalised Pareto shape parameter observed for Hs is different to that observed for wind speed. For this reason, an upper bound of +0.2 for generalised Pareto shape was specified for wind speed analysis, compared to 0.0 for Hs. In some cases, increase of upper bound for waves to 0.1 is justified, leading to slightly more conservative Hs values. We confirmed that the upper end point constraint was not too influential on the distributions of generalised Pareto shape parameter estimated. Nevertheless, it is apparent that specification of bounds for generalised Pareto shape is a critical, but problematic choice in metocean applications.","PeriodicalId":124589,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7B: Ocean Engineering","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7B: Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2019-95913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper describes spatial and seasonal variability of metocean design criteria in the southern South China Sea. Non-stationary extreme value analysis was performed using the CEVA approach (Covariate Extreme Value Analysis,[1]) for a 59-year long SEAFINE hindcast of winds and waves, estimating metocean design criteria up to 10,000-year return period. Wind design criteria are mostly driven by large-scale monsoonal events; at higher return periods infrequent cyclonic events have strong influence on the tail of the extreme value distribution but confined to a limited geographical area. The CEVA analysis of waves showed much less dependence on the tropical cyclone events; the spatial metocean design criteria were smoother, mostly influenced by the monsoonal wind strength, fetch and local bathymetry. Return value estimates illustrate the strong seasonality of metocean design criteria, with boreal winter (December-February, Northeasterly monsoon) contributing most to the extremes, while April and May are the mildest months. Estimates for the ratio of 10,000/100-year return values are also presented, both for winds and waves. There is empirical evidence that the range of “typical” values of generalised Pareto shape parameter observed for Hs is different to that observed for wind speed. For this reason, an upper bound of +0.2 for generalised Pareto shape was specified for wind speed analysis, compared to 0.0 for Hs. In some cases, increase of upper bound for waves to 0.1 is justified, leading to slightly more conservative Hs values. We confirmed that the upper end point constraint was not too influential on the distributions of generalised Pareto shape parameter estimated. Nevertheless, it is apparent that specification of bounds for generalised Pareto shape is a critical, but problematic choice in metocean applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自协变量极值分析的南海南部海洋设计准则的空间和季节变异
本文描述了南海南部海洋设计准则的空间和季节变化。使用CEVA方法(协变量极值分析,[1])对59年的海风和海浪后报进行了非平稳极值分析,估计了长达10,000年的回归期的海洋设计标准。风的设计标准主要由大型季风事件驱动;在较高的回归期,不频繁的气旋事件对极值分布的尾部有很强的影响,但仅限于有限的地理区域。波浪的CEVA分析表明,对热带气旋事件的依赖程度较低;空间气象海洋设计准则较为平滑,主要受季风风强度、水深和局地水深的影响。回归值估计说明了海洋设计标准的强烈季节性,北方冬季(12月至2月,东北季风)对极端情况的贡献最大,而4月和5月是最温和的月份。还提出了风和浪的1万/100年返回值比率的估计值。有经验证据表明,观测到的Hs广义Pareto形状参数的“典型”值范围与观测到的风速不同。由于这个原因,风速分析指定广义帕累托形状的上限为+0.2,而Hs的上限为0.0。在某些情况下,波的上限增加到0.1是合理的,导致Hs值稍微保守一些。我们证实了上限约束对广义Pareto形状参数估计的分布没有太大的影响。然而,很明显,广义帕累托形状的边界规范是一个关键的,但在海洋应用中有问题的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Method for Designing the Backbone for the Segmented Model of an Ultra-Large Container Carrier Development of a PID Control Strategy for a Compact Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Global Assessments of Surface Winds and Waves From an Ensemble Forecast System Using Satellite Data Towards the Development of an Ocean Engineering Library for OpenModelica An Experimental Investigation of the Trim Effect on the Behaviour of a Containership in Shallow Water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1