Industry equilibrium with sustaining and disruptive technology

Xiao Huang, Greys Sošić
{"title":"Industry equilibrium with sustaining and disruptive technology","authors":"Xiao Huang, Greys Sošić","doi":"10.1145/1807406.1807473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers a special type of technology evolution, referred to in the literature as disruptive technology vs. sustaining technology. In general, \"old\" products based on sustaining technology are perceived to be superior to the \"new\" ones based on disruptive technology. However, the latter have distinctive features that allow them to attract an exclusive set of customers. Examples include notebooks vs. netbooks, hard-disk drives vs. solid-state drives, laser printers vs. inkjet printers, etc. We set up a model with an established firm and an entrant firm that have heterogeneous product-offering capabilities: the established firm can offer either or both types of products, while the entrant firm can only offer the new products. Firms make capacity, pricing, and quantity decisions that maximize their ex-ante profit. Within this framework, we analyze deterministic games with perfect information and stochastic games with uncertain valuation of the disruptive technology. Equilibriums decisions are discussed under various market conditions as well as dedicated vs. flexible capacity assumptions. While over-investment and over-production may occur in a stochastic game with dedicated capacities, the equilibrium capacity decision seems to be more rational if the establish firm utilizes flexibly capacity or if the dedicated capacity can be converted ex-post at some expense.","PeriodicalId":142982,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1807406.1807473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper considers a special type of technology evolution, referred to in the literature as disruptive technology vs. sustaining technology. In general, "old" products based on sustaining technology are perceived to be superior to the "new" ones based on disruptive technology. However, the latter have distinctive features that allow them to attract an exclusive set of customers. Examples include notebooks vs. netbooks, hard-disk drives vs. solid-state drives, laser printers vs. inkjet printers, etc. We set up a model with an established firm and an entrant firm that have heterogeneous product-offering capabilities: the established firm can offer either or both types of products, while the entrant firm can only offer the new products. Firms make capacity, pricing, and quantity decisions that maximize their ex-ante profit. Within this framework, we analyze deterministic games with perfect information and stochastic games with uncertain valuation of the disruptive technology. Equilibriums decisions are discussed under various market conditions as well as dedicated vs. flexible capacity assumptions. While over-investment and over-production may occur in a stochastic game with dedicated capacities, the equilibrium capacity decision seems to be more rational if the establish firm utilizes flexibly capacity or if the dedicated capacity can be converted ex-post at some expense.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续和颠覆性技术的产业平衡
本文考虑了一种特殊类型的技术进化,在文献中称为破坏性技术与持续技术。一般来说,基于持续性技术的“旧”产品被认为优于基于破坏性技术的“新”产品。然而,后者有独特的特点,使他们能够吸引一组独特的客户。例子包括笔记本与上网本、硬盘驱动器与固态驱动器、激光打印机与喷墨打印机等。我们建立了一个具有异构产品提供能力的老牌企业和新进入企业的模型:老牌企业可以提供其中一种或两种产品,而新进入企业只能提供新产品。企业做出产能、定价和数量决策,使事前利润最大化。在此框架下,我们分析了具有完全信息的确定性博弈和具有不确定估值的随机博弈。讨论了在各种市场条件下的均衡决策,以及专用与灵活的产能假设。在有专用产能的随机博弈中,可能会出现过度投资和过度生产,但如果企业灵活利用产能,或者专用产能可以在事后花费一定费用进行转换,则均衡产能决策似乎更为合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Game theory and operations management Cost sharing in distribution problems for franchise operations Subgame-perfection in positive recursive games Rationalizability, adaptive dynamics, and the correspondence principle in games with strategic substitutes Structural estimation of discrete-choice games of incomplete information with multiple equilibria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1