Undoing the Double-Cross: Promoting Public Accountability in American Science Agencies

P. Buckley, Kristen Ramsey
{"title":"Undoing the Double-Cross: Promoting Public Accountability in American Science Agencies","authors":"P. Buckley, Kristen Ramsey","doi":"10.38126/jspg180301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The leadership and advisory boards of American science agencies are largely organized according to the ideas set forth by an influential scientist, Dr. Vannevar Bush, after World War II. Although American science agencies are publicly funded, only experts control what research is funded and how each agency operates. Wielding his unique position of power after the war, Dr. Vannevar Bush suppressed the ideas of his adversary, Senator Harley Kilgore, resulting in the absence of public accountability and citizen input that defines American science agencies today. We argue that citizens must have a seat at the table in the leadership of science agencies to promote trust in science, reduce inequity, increase efficiency, embrace democratic principles, and address the needs of the American people. By providing a mechanism for non-expert citizens to influence the direction of American science agencies, Congress can now finally rectify the double-cross of Senator Harley Kilgore by Dr. Vannevar Bush.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The leadership and advisory boards of American science agencies are largely organized according to the ideas set forth by an influential scientist, Dr. Vannevar Bush, after World War II. Although American science agencies are publicly funded, only experts control what research is funded and how each agency operates. Wielding his unique position of power after the war, Dr. Vannevar Bush suppressed the ideas of his adversary, Senator Harley Kilgore, resulting in the absence of public accountability and citizen input that defines American science agencies today. We argue that citizens must have a seat at the table in the leadership of science agencies to promote trust in science, reduce inequity, increase efficiency, embrace democratic principles, and address the needs of the American people. By providing a mechanism for non-expert citizens to influence the direction of American science agencies, Congress can now finally rectify the double-cross of Senator Harley Kilgore by Dr. Vannevar Bush.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解除两面派:促进美国科学机构的公共责任
美国科学机构的领导和顾问委员会在很大程度上是根据一位有影响力的科学家Vannevar Bush博士在第二次世界大战后提出的观点组织起来的。虽然美国的科学机构是公共资助的,但只有专家才能控制资助的研究和每个机构的运作方式。战后,范尼瓦尔·布什博士利用他独特的权力地位,压制了他的对手、参议员哈利·基尔戈(Harley Kilgore)的想法,导致公共问责制和公民参与的缺失,而这正是当今美国科学机构的特点。我们认为,公民必须在科学机构的领导层中占有一席之地,以促进对科学的信任,减少不平等,提高效率,接受民主原则,并解决美国人民的需求。通过为非专家公民提供一种影响美国科学机构方向的机制,国会现在终于可以纠正Vannevar Bush博士对参议员Harley Kilgore的双重欺骗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
अकादमिक स्टेम समुदायों के लिंगुआ फ़्रैंका में विविधता लाने का आह्वान Inclusive Science Policy and Economic Development in the 21st Century: The Case for Rural America Reimagining the U.S. Global Change Research Program to Support Equitable Community Engagement Using a Disability Lens A Call to Diversify the Lingua Franca of Academic STEM Communities Πρόταση για Διαφοροποίηση της Κοινής Γλώσσας Επικοινωνίας των Ακαδημαϊκών Κοινοτήτων STEM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1